We apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. We show how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholarĂ¢ s research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/105439 |
Date | 07 1900 |
Creators | Cronin, Blaise, Meho, Lokman I. |
Publisher | Wiley |
Source Sets | University of Arizona |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Journal Article (Paginated) |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds