Submitted by Ricardo Cedraz Duque Moliterno (ricardo.moliterno@uefs.br) on 2017-10-31T00:06:01Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o final.final.pdf: 1174050 bytes, checksum: 41d2ab0bf1c26d061741c869e1077a85 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-31T00:06:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o final.final.pdf: 1174050 bytes, checksum: 41d2ab0bf1c26d061741c869e1077a85 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-07-13 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The object of study and analysis of this research are the articles published in the Thematic Working Group Inclusion and Difference proceedings Inclusion and Difference of the Brazilian Congress of Sports Sciences, between 2003 and 2013. The general objective is to identify the epistemological bases present in the production of knowledge in Physical Education, from the annals of the mentioned Thematic Working Group, and how these bases respond to the issue of inclusion of students with disabilities. For this purpose, we present how to constitute the relationship between the characterization of the research, the main issues addressed and the inclusion perspectives found in each approach. Using an analytical tool in consonance with the paradigmatic matrix, that points out the technical, methodological, theoretical and epistemological levels. This methodological procedure made it possible to realize, in the 31 articles analyzed, that 90% used the Phenomenological-Hermeneutic approach and 10% used the Critical-Dialectic approach, and has not identified any article used the Empirical-Analytical approach. We found that each level of the instrument used for analysis of the articles made evident the predominance of the approach taken, in other words, in the articles in which the Phenomenological-Hermeneutic approach was predominant, it was observed that the discussion is focused on understanding the phenomena and where these have as a base. In the articles using the Critical-Dialectic approach we note that the discussion was taking as a basis the issues of social context and its alternative processing. Given the limitations found in this research, both personal and time to deepen some debate, it is necessary that further research be done in order to expand and advance the contributions in the knowledge production of physical education, and exclusion / inclusion, pointing out the various conflicts that implies in this context. / Esta pesquisa tem como fonte de estudo e an?lise os artigos publicados nos anais do Grupo de Trabalho Tem?tico Inclus?o e Diferen?a do Congresso Brasileiro de Ci?ncias do Esporte (CONBRACE), entre os anos de 2003 e 2013. O objetivo geral ? identificar as bases epistemol?gicas presentes na produ??o do conhecimento em Educa??o F?sica, a partir dos anais do citado Grupo de Trabalho Tem?tico (GTT), e como estas bases respondem ? quest?o da inclus?o de alunos com defici?ncia. Com este intuito, apresentamos como se instituem as rela??es entre a caracteriza??o da pesquisa, as principais tem?ticas abordadas e as perspectivas de inclus?o em cada abordagem encontrada. Utilizando um instrumento de an?lise em conson?ncia com a matriz paradigm?tica, que aponta os n?veis t?cnico, metodol?gico, te?rico e epistemol?gico. Este procedimento metodol?gico possibilitou perceber nos 31 artigos analisados, que 90% utilizaram a abordagem Fenomenol?gica-Hermen?utica e 10% a abordagem Cr?tico-Dial?tica, sendo que n?o foi identificado nenhum artigo que utilizou a abordagem Emp?rico-Anal?tica. Verificamos que cada n?vel do instrumento utilizado para an?lise dos artigos deixou evidenciada a predomin?ncia da abordagem adotada, ou seja, nos artigos em que a abordagem Fenomenol?gica-Hermen?utica foi predominante, foi poss?vel observar que a discuss?o ? centrada na compreens?o dos fen?menos e onde estes t?m como base. Nos artigos em que utilizaram a abordagem Cr?tico-Dial?tica, constatamos que a discuss?o tomava como base as quest?es do contexto social e as alternativas de transforma??o deste. Diante das limita??es encontradas nesta pesquisa, tanto pessoais quanto de tempo para aprofundar alguns debates, se faz necess?rio que outras pesquisas sejam feitas na perspectiva de ampliar e avan?ar nas contribui??es da produ??o do conhecimento da Educa??o F?sica, da exclus?o/inclus?o apontando os diversos conflitos que implicam neste contexto.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.uefs.br:8080:tede/521 |
| Date | 13 July 2016 |
| Creators | Fernandes, Ilnah de Oliveira |
| Contributors | Silva, Welington Ara?jo |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Mestrado Acad?mico em Educa??o, UEFS, Brasil, DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCA??O |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UEFS, instname:Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, instacron:UEFS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -4285438101026463257, 600, 600, 600, 600, 3298115314873488434, 5178284805913411594, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds