Insolvency systems are fundamental to the functioning of commercial activity. They are essential for the development of credit markets and entrepreneurship, and raise the efficiency level of economies. South Africa’s business rescue regime is an innovative component of its insolvency system because it encompasses more than creditors’ commercial interests; it aims to ensure the equitable treatment of multiple stakeholders such that social, economic and political interests are recognised and optimised as appropriate. However, equitable treatment does not equate to equal treatment. Business rescue organises the claims of stakeholders into a hierarchy. The ranking of tax claims within this hierarchy is controversial because various, divergent social, economic and political interests are implicated by a tax claim against an ailing corporation. This dissertation will assess whether tax claims should be granted some priority in South Africa’s business rescue claims hierarchy. The assessment of the different policy arguments for and against this priority will take place through the lens of corporate reorganisation’s values and policy. This is crucial so that the conclusion is consistent with corporate reorganisation’s objectives rather than being influenced by bias in favour of social or commercial interests.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uct/oai:localhost:11427/30866 |
| Date | 04 February 2020 |
| Creators | Radford, Olivia Jordan |
| Contributors | Bradstreet, Richard |
| Publisher | Faculty of Law, Department of Commercial Law |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Master Thesis, Masters, LLM |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0304 seconds