Return to search

Children's Production of Verbal -s by Dialect Type and Clinical Status

The study examined childrens use of verbal s marking (e.g., he walks) in two nonmainstream dialects of English, African American English (AAE), and Southern White English (SWE). Verbal s marking was of interest because there are gaps in the literature about the nature of this structure within and across typically developing children who speak AAE and SWE and about the nature of this structure in AAE- and SWE-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI).
To address these gaps, childrens verbal s marking was examined as a function of their dialect and clinical status and as a function of a number of linguistic variables. These included: verb regularity, negation of the utterance, meaning of the verb phrase (+/- habitual and/or historical present and +/-historical present), and type of subject preceding the verbal s form. Data came from 57 language samples elicited from six-year-olds (26 were speakers of AAE and 31 were speakers of SWE; 26 with SLI and 31 without SLI).
The results indicated that the childrens verbal s marking varied as a function of their dialect. For the SWE-, but not the AAE-speaking groups, the childrens marking also varied by their clinical status. In addition, the results indicated that four of the linguistic variables influenced the childrens marking of verbal s in different ways. Negation of the verb phrase affected the verbal s marking of three of the four groups, and the direction of the influence was consistent with the adult literature; habituation of the verb phrase also affected the verbal s marking of all four groups, but the direction of the influence ran counter to what has been documented in the adult literature; and verb regularity and historical present tense affected the verbal s marking of the SWE-, but not AAE-speaking groups. For type of subject, the data were insufficient to evaluate the effect of this variable on the childrens rates of marking. Finally, the results showed that all four speaker groups produced six different types of nonmainstream verbal s forms, and they also produced a range of different verb types with the verbal s structure.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-08272009-173846
Date28 August 2009
CreatorsCleveland, Lesli H
ContributorsHondzinski, Jan M, Oetting, Janna B, Hoffman, Paul R, Kunduk, Melda, Norris, Janet A
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-08272009-173846/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0117 seconds