Return to search

Comparing the Treatment Effect of Conversational and Traditional Aphasia Treatments Based on Conversational Outcomes

This prospective Phase I single-subject (ABABA) study repeated across 4 participants with quasi-randomized treatment order investigated the treatment effects of conversation and traditional stimulation treatments on conversational outcomes. Treatment was administered for 10 sessions (2 one-hour weekly sessions) per treatment type. Primary conversational outcomes included 6-minute conversations coded for pragmatic behaviors and percent Correct Information Units (CIUs). Traditional stimulation probes included auditory comprehension, lexical retrieval, and syntax probe performance. Secondary outcome measures represented the domains of the ICF (WHO, 2001) model with the addition of quality of life. These included the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 2007), the American Speech Language and Hearing Associations Functional Assessment of Communication Scale (Frattali, Holland, Thompson, Wohl, & Ferketic, 1995), the Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia (Whitworth, Perkins, & Lesser, 1997), and the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (Hilari, Byng, Lamping, & Smith, 2003).
Results indicated there was a treatment effect for syntax abilities following traditional stimulation therapy for the participants who received this treatment first. The two participants who received traditional stimulation therapy first demonstrated improved conversational outcomes. The participant with moderate aphasia who received conversation therapy first demonstrated an effect for conversation therapy. Visual trends indicated three out of the four participants demonstrated the highest gains in conversational abilities during or following conversation therapy. Percent CIUs increased over time in three participants despite order of treatment. No significant group changes were demonstrated after traditional or conversation therapy on secondary outcome measures. These results provide a template for conducting and measuring conversational therapy.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-04102012-152001
Date11 April 2012
CreatorsCollins, Meghan
ContributorsDonovan, Neila, Gouvier, William, Hicks, Jason, Buckingham, Hugh, Hoffman, Paul
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04102012-152001/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0057 seconds