Return to search

Empirical comparison of robust, data driven and stochastic optimization

Includes bibliographical references (leaf 49). / Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computation for Design and Optimization Program, 2008. / In this thesis, we compare computationally four methods for solving optimization problems under uncertainty: * Robust Optimization (RO) * Adaptive Robust Optimization (ARO) * Data Driven Optimization (DDO) * stochastic Programming (SP) We have implemented several computation experiments to demonstrate the different performance of these methods. We conclude that ARO outperform RO, which has a comparable performance with DDO. SP has a comparable performance with RO when the assumed distribution is the same as the true underlying distribution, but under performs RO when the assumed distribution is different from the true distribution. / by Wang, Yanbo. / S.M.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:MIT/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/45286
Date January 2008
CreatorsWang, Yanbo, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
ContributorsDimitris J. Bertsimas., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computation for Design and Optimization Program., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computation for Design and Optimization Program
PublisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology
Source SetsM.I.T. Theses and Dissertation
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Format49 leaves, application/pdf
RightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission., http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582

Page generated in 0.002 seconds