Return to search

The Relative Efficacy of Positive Expectancy Versus No Expectancy in the Use of Anxiety-Relief Conditioning

An experiment was conducted to study the role of "positive expectancy" when utilizing anxiety-relief conditioning. Fourteen male and female undergraduate psychology students were selected as subjects (Ss), based on pre-test scores obtained on the "Snake Intimacy Test" (SIT). Ss were matched according to pre-SIT scores and randomly assigned to the "positive expectancy" or "no expectancy" groups. Anxiety relief conditioning was administered without variation. Only the rationale given each group describing what was transpiring was different. The statistical results revealed significant improvement by both groups. Also, the "positive expectancy" group improved significantly over the "no expectancy" group. Therefore, "positive expectancy" is apparently a sufficient, but not necessary, variable of anxiety-relief conditioning.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc663084
Date12 1900
CreatorsMcKown, Stanley Earl
ContributorsWenrich, W. W., 1932-, Holloway, Harold D.
PublisherNorth Texas State University
Source SetsUniversity of North Texas
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis or Dissertation
Formativ, 20 leaves : illustrations, Text
RightsPublic, McKown, Stanley Earl, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds