Submitted by Kely Alves (kely.alves@unifenas.br) on 2018-08-01T11:51:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertação Galileu Bonifácio.pdf: 1876947 bytes, checksum: 040bde4c33a32b1025e2822176ae0797 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Kely Alves (kely.alves@unifenas.br) on 2018-08-01T11:52:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertação Galileu Bonifácio.pdf: 1876947 bytes, checksum: 040bde4c33a32b1025e2822176ae0797 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Kely Alves (kely.alves@unifenas.br) on 2018-08-01T11:53:21Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertação Galileu Bonifácio.pdf: 1876947 bytes, checksum: 040bde4c33a32b1025e2822176ae0797 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-01T11:53:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertação Galileu Bonifácio.pdf: 1876947 bytes, checksum: 040bde4c33a32b1025e2822176ae0797 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-12-16 / Introduction: Diagnostic calibration can be defined as the relationship between diagnostic accuracy and the confidence in that accuracy. Reflective practice seems to be an interesting strategy to improve diagnostic calibration by improving performance insights and has been proposed to foster clinical reasoning by improving diagnostic accuracy. However, its effect on diagnostic calibration has yet to be assessed. Aim: This study seeks to evaluate the impact of structured reflection on diagnostic calibration, diagnostic accuracy, and the confidence in that accuracy while solving dermatology case vignettes. Methods: This study recruited sixth year medical students from Universidad José do Rosário Vellano, who were systematically allocated into one of two groups: reflection group (RG) or control group (CG). Students from both groups were presented the same 12 dermatology cases and were initially asked to point out the probable diagnosis and their confidence in that diagnosis. The students allocated to the RG were then told to reflect on the case using a structured tool. Those allocated to the CG engaged in a time-filler activity before providing their final diagnosis for each case and their final confidence in that diagnosis. Both groups were compared as to their diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and diagnostic calibration overall as well as stratified by dermatological syndrome and case difficulty. Results: Sixty-one students were included (33 in the RG and 28 in the CG). Age and self-assessed perception of knowledge/previous experience were similar in both groups. Gender was significantly different among the groups. Students from the RG showed a better diagnostic accuracy for both melanocytic and non-melanocytic lesions (p=0.025 and p=0.022, respectively). Regarding diagnostic calibration, both RG and CG showed better calibration for melanocytic lesions than for non-melanocytic lesions. Calibration for non-melanocytic lesions was more distant from zero, in a positive direction (i.e. greater overconfidence). It was observed that calibration was worse among more difficult cases, with students showing greater overconfidence when solving such cases. Reflection did not impact significantly on confidence nor on calibration (p=0.228 and p=0.197, respectively). It is worth noting that a significant difference was observed in the calibration in both groups when solving easier cases; students from the RG had a greater diagnostic accuracy, but their confidence did not differ from those in the CG, resulting in an opposite direction of calibration (i.e. among students in the RG, diagnostic accuracy was slightly greater than their confidence). Conclusion: Reflective practice increased the overall diagnostic accuracy, but it did not significantly change overall confidence and calibration. Calibration was worse when solving more difficult cases, and reflection was not enough to improve it. / Introdução: A calibragem diagnóstica pode ser definida como a relação entre acurácia e confiança do profissional em relação a esta acurácia. A prática reflexiva é uma potencial estratégia para melhorar a calibragem diagnóstica, pois pode aumentar o insight sobre a performance. O uso da reflexão estruturada para melhoria da calibragem diagnóstica ainda não foi avaliado. Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto da reflexão estruturada na calibragem diagnóstica, acurácia e confiança na resolução de casos dermatológicos. Métodos: estudo realizado entre alunos do 6º ano do curso de medicina da universidade José do Rosário Vellano (UNIFENAS-BH). Os alunos foram divididos em dois grupos (grupo reflexão (GR) e grupo controle (GC)). Os dois grupos avaliaram as mesmas 12 lesões dermatológicas, apontando diagnóstico inicial mais provável e a confiança diagnóstica. Em seguida, os alunos foram orientados a refletirem de maneira estruturada sobre o diagnóstico (GR) ou engajarem em atividade distratora (GC) e então fornecerem o diagnóstico final e o grau de confiança. Foram comparadas acurácia diagnóstica, confiança e calibragem diagnóstica globalmente, por síndrome dermatológica e por grau de dificuldade. Resultados: Foram incluídos 61 alunos, alocados 33 para GR e 28 para GC. Houve predominância de mulheres no GR, mas não houve diferença significativa de idade ou de auto-percepção do conhecimento/experiência prévios entre os grupos. Observou-se uma maior acurácia diagnóstica dos alunos do GR em relação ao GC tanto para síndromes melanocíticas (p=0,025) quanto para não-melanocíticas (p=0,022). Em relação à calibragem diagnóstica, tanto o GC (p=0,017) quanto o GR (p=0,001) apresentaram melhor calibragem para síndromes melanocíticas, sendo que para síndromes não-melanociticas o aluno apresenta maior excesso de confiança. A calibragem foi pior para os casos difíceis com os alunos apresentando excesso de confiança em relação ao seu real desempenho. A reflexão não impactou de maneira significativa em relação à confiança e calibragem de maneira global. Nos casos fáceis, houve diferença de calibragem entre GR e GC, observando-se no GR maior acurácia diagnóstica, mas com confiança semelhante à observada do GC, ocorrendo inversão do sinal da calibragem com os alunos tendo um desempenho levemente superior à sua confiança. Conclusão: A atividade reflexiva aumentou a acurácia diagnóstica de maneira global para as lesões dermatológicas testadas, mas não alterou globalmente a confiança e calibragem diagnóstica. A calibragem piorou nos casos mais difíceis e a reflexão não foi capaz de melhorar esta situação.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.unifenas.br:jspui/201 |
| Date | 16 December 2017 |
| Creators | Costa Filho, Galileu Bonifácio da |
| Contributors | Moura, Alexandre Sampaio, Moura, Josemar de Almeida, Santos, Silvana Maria Eloi |
| Publisher | Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde, UNIFENAS, Brasil, Pós-Graduação |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNIFENAS, instname:Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, instacron:UNIFENAS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -283655251318829813, 500, 500, 600, -7642911903105032531, -969369452308786627, ALDRIGE, R.B.; MAXWELL,S. S.; RESS,J.L Dermatology undergrauduate skin cancer training: a disconnect between recommendations, clinical exposure and competence. BMC Medical Education, Londres, v. 12,n. 27, p. 1-9, 2012. BARNSLEY, L. et al. Clinical skills in junior medical officers: a comparisonof self-reported confidence and observed competence. Medical education, Oxford, v. 38, n. 4, p. 358-367, Apr. 2004. BECKETT, D.; HAGER P. J. Life, Work and Learming: practice in post-modernity. London: Routledge International Studies in Education, 2002. BERLINGER, N.; WU, A. W. Subtracting insult from injury: addressing cultural expectations in the disclosure of medical error. Journal of medical ethics, Londres, v. 31, p. 106-108, 2005. BERNER, E. S.; GRABER, M. L. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. The American journal of medicine, New York, v. 121, n. 5, p. S2-S23, 2008. BLANCH, D. C. et al. Medical student gender and issues of confidence. Patient education and counseling, Princeton, v. 72, n. 3, p. 374-381, Sep. 2008. CAVALCANTI, R. B.; SIBBALD, M. Am I right Wheni Am Sure? Data consistency influences the relationship between diagnostic accuracy and certainty. Academic Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 89, n. 1, p. 107-113, Jan. 2014. GLAZER, A. M. et al. Clinical Diagnosis of skin cancer: enhancing inspection and early recognition. Dermatologic clinics, Philadelphia, v. 35, n. 4, p. 409-416, Oct. 2017. CROSSKERRY, P. Timely recognition and diagnosis of illness. In: MAC-KINNON N, N. T.(Ed.). Safe and Effective: the eight essential elements of an Optimal Medication-use System. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Pharmacists Association, 2007. CUNHA, M. V. Uma reflexão com John Dewey sobre a educação contemporânea. Revista USP, São Paulo, n. 82, p. 215-217, jun./ago. 2009. Disponível em:<https://www.revistas.usp.br/revusp/article/view/13761>. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2017. GOULD, D.; REAM, E. Nurses' views of infection control: an interview study. Journal of advanced nursing, Oxford, v. 19, n. 6, p. 1121-1131, Jun. 1994. HAYS, R. B. et al. Is insight important? Measuring capacity to change performance. Medical education, Oxford, v. 36, n. 10, p. 965-971, 2002. KINSELLA, E. A. Professional knowledge and the epistemology of reflective practice. Nursing philosophy, Oxford, v. 11, n. 1, p. 3-14, Jan. 2010. KORIAT, A.; LICHTENSTEIN, S.; FISCHOFF,B. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning and Memory, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 107-118, 1980. LEOPOLD, S. S. et al. Impact of Educational Intervention of confidence and competence in the performance of a simple surgical task. The Journal of bone and joint surgery, Boston, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1031- 1037, May 2005. MAMEDE, S. et al. Reflection as a strategy to foster medical students’ acquisition of diagnostic competence. Medical education, Oxford, v. 46, n. 5, p. 464-472, 2012. MAMEDE, S. et al. How can students’ diagnostic competence benefit most from practice with clinical cases? The effects of structured reflection on future diagnosis of the same and novel diseases. Academic Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 89, n. 1, p. 121-127, 2014. MAMEDE, S.; SCHMIDT, H. G.; PENAFORTE, J. C. Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 42, n. 5, p. 468-475, May 2008. MAKARY, M. A.; MICHAEL, D. Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US, BMJ, London, v. 353, p. 2139. 2016. MEYER, A. N. D. et al. Physicians diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and resource requests. JAMA Intern Med., Chicago, v. 173, n. 21, p. 1952-1958, Aug. 2013. MEYER, A. N. D.; SINGH, H. Calibrating how doctors think and seek information to minimize errors in diagnosis. BMJ Quality e Safety, London, v. 0, p. 1-3, 2016. Disponível em:<http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/qhc/early/2016/09/26/bmjqs-2016-006071.full.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 Aug. 2017. MORGAN, P. J.; CLEAVE-HOGG, D. Comparison between medical students experience,confidence and competence medical education 2002. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 36, n. 6, p. 534-539, Jun. 2002. REGO, L. L.; BILLETT, M. T.; MORGAN, N. A. Consumer-based brand equity and firm risk. Journal of Marketing, [S.l], v. 73, p. 47-60, Nov. 2009. SCHON, D. A. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: [s.n], 1987. SIECK, W. R.; ARKES, H. R. The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 29-53, 2005. |
Page generated in 0.0033 seconds