Geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) is a soil improvement technology in which closely spaced horizontal layers of geosynthetic are embedded in a soil mass to provide lateral support and increase strength. GRS is popular due to a relatively new application for bridge support, as well as long-standing application in mechanically stabilized earth walls. Several different GRS design methods have been used, and some are application-specific and not based on fundamental principles of mechanics. Because consensus regarding fundamental behavior of GRS is lacking, numerical and mathematical analyses were performed for laboratory tests obtained from the published literature of GRS under triaxial compression in consolidated-drained conditions.
A three-dimensional numerical model was developed using FLAC3D. An existing constitutive model for the soil component was modified to incorporate confining pressure dependency of friction angle and dilation parameters, while retaining the constitutive model's ability to represent nonlinear stress-strain response and plastic yield. Procedures to obtain the parameter values from drained triaxial compression tests on soil specimens were developed. A method to estimate the parameter values from particle size distribution and relative compaction was also developed. The geosynthetic reinforcement was represented by two-dimensional orthotropic elements with soil-geosynthetic interfaces on each side.
Comparisons between the numerical analyses and laboratory tests exhibited good agreement for strains from zero to 3% for tests with 1 to 3 layers of reinforcement. As failure is approached at larger strains, agreement was good for specimens that had 1 or 2 layers of reinforcement and soil friction angle less than 40 degrees. For other conditions, the numerical model experienced convergence problems that could not be overcome by mesh refinement or reducing the applied loading rate; however, it appears that, if convergence problems can be solved, the numerical model may provide a mechanics-based representation of GRS behavior, at least for triaxial test conditions.
Three mathematical theories of GRS failure available in published literature were applied to the laboratory triaxial tests. Comparisons between the theories and the tests results demonstrated that all three theories have important limitations.
These numerical and mathematical evaluations of laboratory GRS tests provided a basis for recommending further research. / Ph. D. / Sometimes soils in nature do not possess the strength characteristics necessary to be used in a specific engineering application, and soil improvement technologies are necessary. Geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) is a soil improvement technology in which closely spaced horizontal layers of geosynthetic material are placed in a soil mass to provide lateral support and increase the strength of the reinforced mass. The geosynthetic materials used in GRS are flexible sheets of polymeric materials produced in the form of woven fabrics or openwork grids. This technology is widely used to improve the strength of granular soil to form walls and bridge abutments.
Current design methods for GRS applications are case specific, some of these methods do not rely on fundamental principles of physics, and consensus regarding the fundamental behavior of GRS is lacking. To improve understanding of GRS response independent of application, the three dimensional response of GRS specimens to axisymmetric loading were investigated using numerical and mathematical analysis.
A numerical model using the finite difference method in which the domain is discretized in small zones was developed, and this model can capture the response of GRS laboratory specimens under axisymmetric loading with reasonably good accuracy at working strains (up to 3% strain). This numerical model includes a robust constitutive model for the soil that is capable of representing the most important stiffness and strength characteristics of the soil.
For large strains approaching failure loading, the numerical model encountered convergence difficulties when the soil strength was high or when more than two layers of reinforcement were used. As an alternative to discretized numerical analysis, three mathematical theories available in the published literature were applied to the collected GRS laboratory test data. These evaluations demonstrated that all three theories have important limitations in their ability to represent failure of GRS laboratory test specimens.
This study is important because it proposed a numerical model in 3D to represent the GRS behavior under working strains, and it identified several limitations of mathematical theories that attempt to represent the ultimate strength of GRS. Based on these findings, recommendations for further research were developed.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/84428 |
| Date | 03 February 2017 |
| Creators | Santacruz Reyes, Karla |
| Contributors | Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ziotopoulou, Aikaterini, Filz, George M., Brandon, Thomas L., Dove, Joseph E., Rodriguez-Marek, Adrian |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds