Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:24:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2007-02-26Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:51:42Z : No. of bitstreams: 1
oliveira_acbm_me_arafo.pdf: 4311802 bytes, checksum: 1f571cd42db44ab09a36226da7dcd075 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito de instrumentos de acabamento e técnicas de polimento sobre a rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas e comparar ao esmalte humano íntegro, através do Microscópio de Força Atômica (MFA). Superfícies planas de face vestibular de quatro incisivos centrais superiores humanos hígidos foram usadas para análise da rugosidade superficial do esmalte. Resinas compostas nanoparticulada (Filtek Supreme XT, 3M ESPE), microhíbrida (Point 4, Kerr Corp.), híbrida (tetric Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) e microparticulada (Durafill VS, Heraeus Külzer) foram avaliadas. Todas as amostras de resinas compostas foram confeccionadas sob uma tira de poliéster. Os procedimentos de acabamento superficial foram realizados com uma fresa carbide de 30 lâminas e uma ponta diamantada de 30 æm nas amostras de resinas compostas nanoparticulada e microhíbrida. Quatro técnicas de polimento (TO : Matriz de poliéster - controle: T1 : discos de óxido de alumínio; T2 : disco de feltro + pasta diamantada) foram testadas em todas as amostras de resinas compostas. Nrugosidade média superficial (Ra) foi avaliada pelo MFA no modo contato. Os dados obtidos foram submetidos ao Teste t de Student, á análise de variância e ao Teste de Tukey, ao nível de 5% de significância. A maior lisura superficial foi obtida com a matriz de poliéster para Filttek Supreme XT (Ra=23,63nm), Point 4 (Ra=12,84nm) e Tetric Ceram (Ra=15,20nm). Aresina Durafill VS foi menos rugosa com os discos de óxido de alumínio (Ra=43,05nm). A maior rugosidade superficial foi obtida com a ponta diamantada para Filek Supreme XT (Ra=510,55nm) e Point 4 (Ra=531,64nm), sem diferença estatisticamente significante entre elas. A rugosidade superficial do esmalte foi de 46,55 nm. Com base nestes resultados põde-se concluir que a rugosidade superficial aumentou significamente... / The aim of this study was to assess the effect of finishing instruments and of polishing techniques on surface roughness of composite resins and to compare to intact human enamel through Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). Flat buccal surface of four caries-free human maxillary central incisors were used for the roughness analysis of enamel. Nanofiller (Filtek Supreme XT, 3M ESPE), microhubrid (Point 4, Kerr Corp.), hybrid (tetric Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) and microfilled Durafill V.S., Heraeus Külzer) composite resins were evaluated. Mylar matrix strip was used as control group for both analyses. Finishing procedures were done with a 30-blade carbide bur and 30 æm finishing diamond ur for nanofiller and microhybrid resins. Four polishing techniques weretested (T0 : Mylar matrix - control; T1: aluminium oxide discs; T2: felt disc+ diamond paste; T3: aluminium oxide discs + felt disc + diamond paste in all composite resins. The mean roughness (Ra) was evaluaed under AFM on the contact mode. The obtained data was submitted to Studentþs t test, variance , variance analysis (ANOVA) and, Tukeyþs Test, at 5% level of significance. The smoothest surface was obtained with ylar matrix associated with Filtek Supreme XT (Ra=23,63nm), Point 4 (Ra=12,84nm) and Tetric ceram (Ra=15,20nm). Durafill VS showed the lowest roughness with aluminium oxide discs (Ra=43,05nm). The highest surface eoughness was obtained with diamond bur for Fittek Supreme XT (Ra=510,55nm) and point 4 (Ra=531,64nm), without significant difference between them. Surface roughness of enamel was of 46,55nm. Roughness increased significantly after fishing procedures. 30-blade carbide bur produced less roughness compared to extra fine diamond bur. Diamond paste also increased the roughness of composites. Aluminium oxide discs may be used as standard polishing technique for all composite resins, except for hybrid... (Complete abstract, click electronic access below)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/89646 |
| Date | 26 February 2007 |
| Creators | Oliveira, Ana Carolina Botta Martins de [UNESP] |
| Contributors | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Júnior, Sillas Luiz Lordello Duarte [UNESP] |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | 100 p. : il.color. + anexo |
| Source | Aleph, reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP, instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista, instacron:UNESP |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1, -1 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds