Concrete design rules can facilitate the designer to depict capable design and reliable products. However, it is difficult to deduce systematic design rules from previous experience and to modify the rules in a rule-based system. In the last decade, Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) has become an important methodology to solve the problem. The objective of this paper is to determine the appropriate case representation used in assembly part design for developing a CBR system. The designer can obtain real-time Early experimental results indicate that the case representation can appropriately represent the expertise and experience of assembly part design based on CBR methodology.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ETSU/oai:dc.etsu.edu:etsu-works-19305 |
| Date | 01 December 2006 |
| Creators | Chang, Guanghsu, Su, Cheng Chung, Priest, John W. |
| Publisher | Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University |
| Source Sets | East Tennessee State University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Source | ETSU Faculty Works |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds