The objective of this thesis is to evaluate, whether microfinance are a suitable instrument for development aid. It maps the factors that caused the microfinance crisis in 2008 to 2010 and validates the proposed reform measures. It describes and compares the effeciency and results of microfinance substitutes in the field of development aid, which are governmental, non-governmental and commercial programmes with similar objectives declared. It also analyses data from 2008 to 2014 from the point of view of social indicator reporting and acceptance of the new concept among microfinance institutions. Conclusion is reached based on these three components: ability to reform microfinance, possibilities of other programmes and situation in social reporting. Microfinance isn´t a suitable instrument for poverty reduction as such, but serves as a complement to provide for development of poor regions and financial inclusion of poor inhabitants.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:201973 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Vaněčková, Markéta |
| Contributors | Vostrovská, Zdenka, Loužek, Marek |
| Publisher | Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0095 seconds