ABSTRACT
Pirating Human Rights studies critical theorists and activists insights on rights in order to bring these two differently situated traditions into productive relation. Arguing the lefts critique of rights has led us to the next stage of rightsrights as collective critiquethe literature I analyze documents activists occupation of and resistance to apolitical humanitarian rights. What emerges from this resistance is a radically democratic production of rights that challenges the apoliticalness of humanitarian rights and widens the frame of discourse from accounts of individual pathologies to structural analysis. Shaped by a genealogical and rhetorical approach, this project foregrounds activists refusal of transhistorical claims of good or evil and their insistence that words matter. The language of rights matters, not only because they count differently for the disfigured, but because wordsas containers that do not mean without struggleare a radical site of occupation, resistance, and production.
I develop my argument in two parts: part one is an archeology of political rights and part two analyzes the architectures of human rights. The first three chapters place deferral, disruption, and destabalization at the center of a critique of liberalism. Chapter one analyzes The Ripening and Louise Bennetts Bans O Killing to exhume the lost anti-colonial sensibilities beneath the international codification of human rights. Chapter two draws on these anti-teleological impulses against the neo-liberal rhetoric of the World Bank. Analyzing The Harder They Come and No Telephone to Heaven, I argue these texts attention to formalism is part of a larger project to make visible and disrupt global capitals evisceration of Third World rights. Chapter three turns to the links between the generic and doctrinal politics of the alter-globalization movement to trace the network narratives impulse to make visible the unmanageable new protagonists of globalization. Part two uses social geography to analyze the UDHR and an activist graphic to articulate a radical reformulation of human rights as democracy. I conclude with an analysis of parodys, and this dissertations, constitutive political actiontakingto draw out the implications that political will is not granted by gift but by demand.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-07292010-133840 |
| Date | 12 August 2010 |
| Creators | Passino, Sarah McAuley |
| Contributors | Dana D. Nelson, Colin Dayan, Cecelia Tichi, Jaya Kasibhatla, Joseph Slaughter |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07292010-133840/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds