Field trials conducted over two years evaluated weed control programs in second generation glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). In a co-application study, glyphosate applied alone at the standard rate or in combination with acephate, acetamiprid, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, dicrotophos, dimethoate, emanectin benzoate, imidacloprid, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, methoxyfenozide, spinosad, thiamethoxam, zeta-cypermethrin, mepiquat pentaborate, sodium calcium borate, and a foliar nitrogen fertilizer resulted in similar control of barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] (96-97%), johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] (98%), hemp sesbania [Sesbania herbacea (P. Mill.) McVaugh] (66-73%), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.) (67-72%), and sicklepod [Senna obtusifolia (L.) H. S. Irwin & Barneby] (86-91%), regardless of application timings at 3 to 4 lf or 7 to 8 lf weed stages. Additionally, fresh weight reduction was equivalent for treatments of glyphosate alone and co-applications and ranged from 89 to 100%. Weed control data from field studies in second generation GR cotton indicate the inclusion of fluometuron preemergence (PRE) to glyphosate postemergence over-the-top (POT) programs beneficial for some, but not all species evaluated, and very little difference was observed between two or three POT applications of glyphosate. Use of fluometuron PRE can prove beneficial in maximizing yield when early season glyphosate applications are delayed. In a related study, data suggests herbicides s-metolachlor, pyrithiobac, and trifloxysulfuron provide similar season-long control of most weeds evaluated. Barnyardgrass and browntop millet [Urochloa ramosa (L.) Nguyen] control can be maximized with co-application of s-metolachlor and glyphosate. Timing of residual herbicide applied at 2, 6, or 10 lf had little or no affect on control observed. For palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), sicklepod, barnyardgrass, and browntop millet, season-long control was optimized with residual herbicide applied at the 2 or 10 lf growth stages. Similar yield response can be expected among herbicides evaluated in combination with glyphosate. Analysis of yield data suggest the most consistent residual herbicide application timing for optimizing yield occurred at the 2 lf growth stage.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-03282006-100706 |
| Date | 28 March 2006 |
| Creators | Scroggs, Derek McLain |
| Contributors | Alexander M. Stewart, Donnie K. Miller, James L. Griffin |
| Publisher | LSU |
| Source Sets | Louisiana State University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-03282006-100706/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds