Return to search

The Development and Testing of the Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning

Maternal functioning in the year following childbirth has exacted inadequate attention in the research literature. The negative effects of postpartum depression on mother and child have been more extensively studied. This deficit in the area of maternal functioning research is of public health significance as functional status may be a more direct measure of deleterious effects on infant development than depression status.
Functioning and factors associated with functioning during this critical time period for infant development has been primarily studied by a handful of researchers. Prior to the development of the Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning (BIMF), the Inventory of Functional Status After Childbirth (IFSAC) was the only instrument designed for the express purpose of measuring functional status. However, the IFSAC is less than ideal for measuring this important concept; its rigid definition of functional status makes it difficult for women to achieve full functional status. This precipitated the development of the BIMF.
The BIMF was developed through qualitative methods. New mother focus group discussions provided much of the content (and the framework for a new definition of functional status) that is reflected in the BIMF. This method of survey development has many advantages and helps to ensure content validity and a patient-centered product. The BIMF was also critiqued by a panel of experts in relevant fields. This work resulted in a new 20-item self-report measure of maternal functioning. In an initial psychometric analysis, the BIMF exhibited good reliability (and validity), with a Cronbachs Alpha of 0.87.
An analysis of factors related to maternal functioning (as measured by the BIMF) in a population of women who screened positive for depressive symptoms revealed an association of functioning with depression and atypical depression. Race and atypical depression were independently associated with the BIMF in a stepwise regression analysis. The BIMF and the Gratification Checklist were also significantly and positively correlated.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-07292009-090149
Date29 September 2009
CreatorsBarkin, Jennifer Lynn
ContributorsLisa Bodnar, Katherine Wisner, Stephen Wisniewski, Scott Beach, Joyce Bromberger
PublisherUniversity of Pittsburgh
Source SetsUniversity of Pittsburgh
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-07292009-090149/
Rightsrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.002 seconds