Effective use of bioassessments requires an understanding of their performance. This
study evaluated the performance of Skeena Reference Condition Approach (RCA)
bioassessments by calculating Type I and Type II error rates and power using a data set of
artificially-impacted test sites.
Results from this study demonstrated that there are trade-offs between the two error
types. Type I error rates – the chance of concluding that a site is impacted when it isn’t – were
higher than expected based on decision points set in the assessments. Type II error rates – the
chance of concluding that a site is not impacted when it is – were often even greater.
To achieve sustainable development, resource managers who use Skeena bioassessments
must carefully consider the risks associated with making errors, and may wish to set decision
points that result in more Type I errors in order to reduce the likelihood of making costly Type II
errors.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:BRC.10170/440 |
| Date | 24 June 2011 |
| Creators | Downie, Aaron J. |
| Contributors | Bailey, John L. |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0013 seconds