En la obra de Pieter Bruegel encontramos elementos que, por mucho tiempo, la
historiografía consideró antitéticos. ¿Cuáles son esos elementos y por qué fueron
comprendidos como antagónicos? Para responder a estas preguntas deberemos
analizar su obra, estudiar su contexto, y dialogar con las investigaciones que se
dedicaron a él. Sin embargo, nuestro objetivo principal es sobre todo proponer una
lectura que reconcilie la irreductible multiplicidad que vive al interior de sus obras, i.e.
hacer patente la heterogeneidad y, sin anularla, superar su aparente incompatibilidad. / In Pieter Bruegel’s work we find elements that were for long regarded as antithetic by
historiography. What are those elements and why were they perceived as
antagonistic? In order to provide an answer to those questions we shall analyze his
work, study his context, and entertain a dialogue with the studies focused on him.
However, our main objective is to provide an interpretation that reconciles the
irreducible multiplicity that inhabits his works, i.e. to stress the heterogeneity and,
without nullifying it, to transcend its seeming incompatibility. / Tesis
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PUCP/oai:tesis.pucp.edu.pe:123456789/6278 |
| Date | 21 September 2015 |
| Creators | Luna Málaga, Natasha |
| Contributors | Michaud Couzin, Cécile Anne |
| Publisher | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Source Sets | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Language | Spanish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf, application/pdf |
| Source | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Repositorio de Tesis - PUCP |
| Rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Peru, info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/pe/ |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds