Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:40:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
VeronicaSP_tese.pdf: 577201 bytes, checksum: e41ce8fd26195606f8650fbf1d39f279 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007-09-27 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / The proposal of the Unified Health System Policy (SUS) has been considered one of the most democratic public policies in Brazil. In spite of this, its implementation in a context of social inequalities has demanded significant efforts. From a socio-constructionist perspective on social psychology, the study focused on the National Policy for Permanent Education in Health for the Unified Health System (SUS), launched by the Brazilian government in 2004, as an additional effort to improve practices and accomplish the effective implementation of the principles and guidelines of the Policy. Considering the process of permanent interdependencies between these propositions and the socio-political and cultural context, the study aimed to identify the discursive constructions articulated in the National Policy for Permanent Education in Health for the Unified Health System (SUS) and how they fit into the existing power relations of ongoing Brazilian socio-political context. Subject positionings and action orientation offered to different social actors by these discursive constructions and the kind of practices allowed were also explored, as well as the implementation of the proposal in Rio Grande do Norte state and how this process was perceived by the people involved. The information produced by documental analyses, participant observation and interviews was analyzed as proposed by Institutional Ethnography. It evidenced the inter-relations between the practices of different social actors, the conditions available for those practices and the interests and power relations involved. Discontinuities on public policies in Brazil and the tendency to prioritize institutional and personal interests, in detriment of collective processes of social transformation, were some of obstacles highlighted by participants. The hegemony of the medical model and the individualistic and curative intervention practices that the model elicits were also emphasized as one of the drawbacks of the ongoing system. Facing these challenges, reflexivity and dialogism appear as strategies for a transformative action, making possible the denaturalization of ongoing practices, as well as the values and tenets supporting them / Uma das mais significativas propostas de democratiza??o no campo das pol?ticas p?blicas no Brasil, o Sistema ?nico de Sa?de (SUS) vem demandando grandes esfor?os visando sua efetiva implementa??o, em um contexto de gritantes desigualdades sociais. Adotando o referencial da psicologia social de orienta??o s?cio-construcionista, o estudo enfocou a Pol?tica de Educa??o e Desenvolvimento para o SUS, oficializada em 2004, como mais uma tentativa de mudan?a das pr?ticas setoriais para efetiva??o dos princ?pios e diretrizes do SUS. Considerando as interdepend?ncias entre as referidas proposi??es e o contexto s?cio-pol?tico e cultural, o estudo objetivou identificar as constru??es discursivas pr?prias da Pol?tica de Educa??o e Desenvolvimento para o SUS, considerando as posi??es de sujeito e as possibilidades de a??o que ela oferece e o tipo de pr?ticas que as constru??es discursivas promovem, no confronto com o cotidiano dos servi?os de sa?de. A implementa??o dessa proposta de transforma??o no Estado do Rio Grande do Norte e a forma como est?o sendo percebidas pelas pessoas envolvidas, foram tamb?m estudadas em profundidade. A an?lise das informa??es, geradas atrav?s de consulta documental, observa??o participante e entrevistas, desvelou as inter-rela??es entre as pr?ticas dos diversos atores, as condi??es de exerc?cio das mesmas e os interesses e rela??es de poder, locais e translocais, em jogo, segundo a proposta metodol?gica da Etnografia Institucional. A descontinuidade das pol?ticas p?blicas no Brasil, a prioriza??o de interesses institucionais e pessoais, em detrimento dos processos de constru??o coletiva de pr?ticas transformadoras, al?m da desresponsabiliza??o dos envolvidos com a efetiva??o das propostas, foram alguns dos entraves evidenciados. A hegemonia do modelo biom?dico no conjunto da sociedade, e as pr?ticas individuais e curativas dele derivadas foram criticadas de forma contundente. A reflexividade e o dialogismo emergiram como estrat?gias para uma a??o transformadora, propiciando a desnaturaliza??o das pr?ticas vigentes e dos valores e pressupostos que as sustentam
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/17577 |
Date | 27 September 2007 |
Creators | Pinheiro, Ver?nica de Souza |
Contributors | CPF:00870893432, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3908124859705245, Jac?-vilela, Ana Maria, CPF:31609414772, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3328632520501565, Pedrosa, Jose Ivo dos Santos, CPF:09587624300, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6840344738247576, Macedo, Maur?cio Roberto Campelo de, CPF:43006698720, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3673586188321966, Oliveira, Isabel Maria Farias Fernandes de, CPF:77891120404, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6077243255728600, Traverso-y?pez, Martha Azucena |
Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Psicologia Social, UFRN, BR, Psicologia Social; Processos Psicossociais; Rela??es de Poder e Sociedade |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds