Urban designers do not typically include research or evidence in practice, though the need for an evidence-based approach is becoming increasingly apparent. The way our built environment is constructed affects our health, well-being, and sense of place, as prior research has uncovered. Historically, urban design practice has negatively affected the well-being of urban residents by reinforcing inequitable social and power structures through the design of public space. Some theorists and designers have proposed evidence-based approaches as a response to these concerns. However, the emerging approaches can be disjointed. Tensions arise when deciding between the many types of evidence urban designers can use, and the different ethics they represent. In this thesis, I analyze three existing approaches to evidence-based urban design, including their benefits and their concerns, and ultimately argue that a convergent method is necessary. The conceptual framework I develop is one that responds to concerns of equity and accountability in the built environment, while also maintaining the significance of good design and acknowledging the inevitable integration of technology into society today. / Master of Urban and Regional Planning / Urban design is typically an artistic profession, and conducting or referencing research is not necessarily part of an urban designer's day-to-day. However, the need for a research-backed, or evidence-based, approach to public space design is becoming increasingly apparent. Prior researchers have suggested that the way our cities, neighborhoods, parks, roadways and other public spaces are constructed has an effect on our mental and physical health. Historically, these spaces have been designed to reinforce patterns of social inequity, which has negatively affected the well-being of urban residents. Some theorists and designers have proposed evidence-based approaches as a response to these concerns. However, the emerging approaches towards evidence-based urban design sometimes have conflicting physical and social goals. In this thesis, I analyze three existing approaches to evidence-based urban design, including their benefits and their concerns. I ultimately argue that a new method, which converges the existing methods, is necessary. The conceptual framework I develop is one that responds to concerns of equity and accountability in urban space, maintains the significance of artistry and good design, and acknowledges the inevitable integration of technology into society today.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/115326 |
| Date | 05 June 2023 |
| Creators | Carney, Mackenzie Amelia |
| Contributors | Urban Affairs and Planning, Misra, Shalini, Cahen, Claire, Cowell, Margaret M. |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds