Return to search

How doctors practiced the new evidence

Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) receives significant attention worldwide. Many studies have used questionnaires to discuss the factors obstructing the practice of EBM. There has however been no large-scale data analysis on who and when to practice EBM. This study aims to fill this gap in research by applying nationally representative data to analyze EBM practice after the provision of new evidence regarding rosiglitazone prescription.
Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Database in Taiwan to analyze the changes in the prescription of rosiglitazone after meta-analysis found the drug to increase the risk of myocardial infarction. The study period was 18 months from the second quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter in 2008. Two models of doctors¡¦ prescription behaviors were analyzed in the study. We conducted univariate analyses to distinguish significant differences in the variable and applied multivariate logistic analyses to predict the probability of physicians ceasing to prescribe rosiglitazone.
Results: We found a significant improvement in EBM practice from specialists and experienced physicians. When compared to other specialists, endocrinologists were four times more likely to change rosiglitazone prescription (OR: 4.129, 95% CI: 2.484-6.863). Doctors with more than 10 years of specialist experience performed better in EBM practice than younger doctors. The hospital level that a physician worked at was not a significant factor. Local urbanization and economic status did not affect the practice of EBM by physicians in clinics either.
Conclusions: Our study found that the EBM was still not well practiced among doctors in Taiwan. The practice of new evidence depended on the specialty or professional experience. Younger doctors and doctors working in medical centers seemed not to practice EBM well. In clinics, patients did not have enough influence to modify the doctor¡¦s prescription behavior. There was a significant time lag between the EBM emergence and EBM practice. This suggests that setting up an authoritative organization to provide timely EBM recommendations is very important. Further improvements to the practice of EBM are still urgently needed within the medical community.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0717112-100836
Date17 July 2012
CreatorsLu, Yun-Chieh
ContributorsMei-Chiun Tseng, Ying-Chun Li, David Lin Lee
PublisherNSYSU
Source SetsNSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive
LanguageCholon
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0717112-100836
Rightsunrestricted, Copyright information available at source archive

Page generated in 0.0019 seconds