A comparison of national trade mark with Community trade mark The purpose of this thesis is to provide fundamental information about trademarks and their legal regulation. In my thesis I focus on the decision making practice of the ÚVP, the European Union Intellectual Property Office and I attempt to compare their argumentation at decision making practice. In order to compare the decision making of the two offices I decided, because their legislations are very similar and their comparison would not be of great significance. Following the amendment by regulation no. 2424/2015 there have been some changes such as abolition of the necessity a graphical representation, the introduction of the so-called certification trade mark or the explicitly anchoring of the sound as a sign of a capable label. After the novella in the thesis I analyzed the decisions of the two authorities in the matters of assessing the registrability of the signs applied for. I have focused on the two absolute grounds for declaring incapability, namely the descriptiveness of the sign referred to in § 4 letter c) of the Act, respectively Article 7 subsection 1 letter (c) of the Regulation and the generality of the marking referred to in § 4 letter d) of the Act, respectively Article 7 subsection 1 letter d) of the Regulation. Each...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:365236 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Kovářová, Alice |
| Contributors | Horáček, Vít, Rozehnal, Aleš |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds