abstract: This experiment uses the Community of Knowledge framework to better understand how jurors interpret new information (Sloman & Rabb, 2016). Participants learned of an ostensibly new scientific finding that was claimed to either be well-understood or not understood by experts. Despite including no additional information, expert understanding led participants to believe that they personally understood the phenomenon, with expert understanding acting as a cue for trustworthiness and believability. This effect was particularly pronounced with low-quality sources. These results are discussed in the context of how information is used by jurors in court, and the implications of the “Community of Knowledge” effect being used by expert witnesses. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Psychology 2018
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:asu.edu/item:50550 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Contributors | Jones, Ashley C. T. (Author), Schweitzer, Nicholas J. (Advisor), Neal, Tess M.S. (Committee member), Salerno, Jessica M. (Committee member), Arizona State University (Publisher) |
| Source Sets | Arizona State University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Masters Thesis |
| Format | 50 pages |
| Rights | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds