Expert and Expert Opinion in Civil Proceedings Abstract This thesis combines the topic of expert opinion as an important means of proof in civil court proceedings with wider issues of expertise. That means it also deals with the conditions for the proper performance of the expert activity with a focus on its outcome - expert opinion. Understanding these relationships in their contexts can play an important role in seeking good practice in the judicial proceeding, evaluating an expert opinion by a court or even being subject to de lege ferenda considerations in the area of regulatory and procedural rules. Since the correct and effective use of this means of proof has a direct impact on the speed and cost efficiency of court proceedings, the issue of optimal setting of expert activity is currently highly up- to-date. Therefore, this thesis focuses first on the issues related to the activity of judicial experts, its legal regulation and deals with the analysis of the requirements of the expert opinion and the correct course of the expert in its elaboration. The next part follows a brief introduction to the theory of proof and represents an expert opinion as a specific means of proof using in civil court proceedings, which requires a number of partial steps. The work focuses on the effects of proper activity of...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:403909 |
| Date | January 2019 |
| Creators | Dörfl, Luboš |
| Contributors | Macková, Alena, Sedláček, Miroslav, Rozehnal, Aleš |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds