Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:07:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
NaraJMCM_DISSERT.pdf: 1183698 bytes, checksum: 8d3625f2ab250f1d640eb44f5cc7ddaa (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-01-31 / Based on studies on the structure of copulates sentences in Brazilian Portuguese (PB),
according to grammar theory, it s analyzed on this dissertation, the complex copulate
sentences what, in the PB, initiated by the formation ? ruim que in the PB, bringing the
hypothesis that they can have one predicacional reading (PRED) and other especificacional
reading (ESP). It s revealed what, though they are similar slightly, that makes the different
that are triggered is structural configuration of sentence and the form as come emerged the its
constituents: that of PRED interpretation, that we defined as Common Copulate Sentence (or
SCC), it s checked that the constituent ruim, and only it, is predicate of a Small Clause, and
appears in the structure on even position wherein is pronounced, not passing by the method of
movement, from where introduce wide predication on all subject, that is the CP built-in; those
sentences ? ruim que understanding ESP, that denominate of Negative Copulate Sentence (or
SCN), whereas the fixed expression contradict or right what is asserted in built-in, it s
perceived what the ruim is a part of this fixed expression, and surely crystallized, which
appears in structure per movement, germinated as adjunct of Inflexional Phrase (IP) and being
elevation to specifier to FocP (or SpecFocP), where acquires discursive interpretation of
focus. Besides the mode as the ruim or the fixed expression emerge in that sentences, the
relation between the copula and main verb likewise contribute to distinguish the sentences: 1)
regarding flexion of mode, when is a SCC, the copula must be in the mode indicative, and the
main verb, in the subjunctive; when is a SCN, copula and main verb must be always on
indicative; 2) regarding flexion of temp, both the copula as main verb of the SCC can be
flexed, whereas at the SCN, the main verb can vary in present, past and future, but the copula
should appear, necessarily, in third persona of present of indicative, what confirms our
hypothesis that there is an fixed expression at the copulate sentences with ? ruim que ESP.
Other two evidences are pointed as characteristics that distinguish the sentence with ? ruim
que PRED of sentence with ? ruim que ESP: 1) in semantics, the constituent ruim equals not
good, that has appreciation, when the reading will PRED; already the pair ? ruim equals not,
at the ESP; 2) in prosody, there discrete sound elevation the ruim on the other constituents of
SCC, PRED, while there is accentuated acoustic elevation on the ruim of SCN, ESP. Our
search it is grounded in authors as Zanfeliz (2000), Modesto (2001), Mioto (2003), Kato &
Ribeiro (2006), Lobo (2006), Quarezemin (2006, 2009, 2011, 2012) e Resenes (2009),
researchers that devoted their attention on studies the formation and organization of the
constituents of cleaved sentences and focalization of constituent, basing itself in approach
generative of linguistic / Embasados em trabalhos sobre a estrutura das senten?as copulares no Portugu?s Brasileiro
(PB), conforme a teoria da gram?tica, analisamos nesta disserta??o as senten?as copulares
complexas encabe?adas pela estrutura ? ruim que no PB, trazendo a hip?tese de que elas
podem ter uma leitura predicacional (PRED) e outra especificacional (ESP). Revelamos que,
apesar de serem superficialmente id?nticas, o que contribui para que as distintas leituras sejam
desencadeadas ? a configura??o estrutural da senten?a e a forma como aparecem os seus
constituintes: naquelas de interpreta??o PRED, que as definimos como Senten?a Copular
Comum (ou SCC), checamos que o constituinte ruim, e somente ele, ? o predicador de uma
Small Clause, e surge na estrutura no lugar mesmo em que ? pronunciado, n?o passando por
processo de movimento, de onde insere ampla predica??o sobre todo o sujeito, que ? o CP
encaixado; naquelas ? ruim que de entendimento ESP, que chamamos de Senten?a Copular de
Nega??o (ou SCN), tendo em vista a express?o fixa negar ou corrigir o que ? afirmado na
encaixada, verificamos que o ruim faz parte dessa express?o fixa, e j? cristalizada, a qual
aparece na estrutura por meio de movimento, nascendo como adjunto de IP e sendo al?ado at?
o especificador de FocP (ou SpecFocP), onde adquire fun??o discursiva de foco. Al?m da
forma como o ruim ou a express?o fixa surge nessas senten?as, a rela??o entre a c?pula e o
verbo principal tamb?m contribui para distinguir as senten?as: 1) quanto ? flex?o de modo,
quando ? uma SCC, a c?pula deve estar no modo indicativo, e o verbo principal, no
subjuntivo; quando ? uma SCN, c?pula e verbo principal devem estar sempre no modo
indicativo; 2) quanto ? flex?o de tempo, tanto a c?pula quanto o verbo principal das SCC
podem ser flexionados, enquanto nas SCN, o verbo principal pode variar entre presente,
passado e futuro, mas a c?pula deve aparecer, necessariamente, na terceira pessoa do presente
do indicativo, o que vem confirmar nossa hip?tese de que h? uma express?o fixa nas
estruturas copulares com ? ruim que ESP. Outras duas evid?ncias s?o apontadas como
caracter?sticas que distinguem a senten?a com ? ruim que PRED da senten?a com ? ruim que
ESP: 1) na sem?ntica, o constituinte ruim equivale a n?o ? bom, que tem valor apreciativo,
quando a leitura for PRED; o par ? ruim equivale a n?o, nas ESP; 2) na pros?dia, h? uma
discreta eleva??o sonora do ruim sobre os demais constituintes das SCC, PRED, enquanto h?
uma acentuada eleva??o ac?stica sobre o ruim das SCN, ESP. Nossa pesquisa est?
fundamentada em autores como Zanfeliz (2000), Modesto (2001), Mioto (2003), Kato &
Ribeiro (2006), Lobo (2006), Quarezemin (2006, 2009, 2011, 2012) e Resenes (2009),
pesquisadores que dedicaram aten??o ? forma??o e constru??o das constru??es clivadas e
focaliza??o, baseando-se na perspectiva da corrente gerativa da lingu?stica
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/16317 |
| Date | 31 January 2014 |
| Creators | Marcelino, Nara Juscely Minervino de Carvalho |
| Contributors | CPF:02161336967, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3589064971368456, Silva, Jos? Romerito, CPF:13052853449, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3019853017228573, Quarezemin, Sandra, CPF:03493664974, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6947094106086321, Martins, Marco Antonio |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos da Linguagem, UFRN, BR, Lingu?stica Aplicada; Literatura Comparada |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0034 seconds