It is not uncommon for criminals to start a fire at a crime scene to conceal evidence of the initial crime. The rationale for this can be attributed to the belief that a fire will destroy all physical evidence. It has been shown in previous research that physical evidence in the form of ignitable liquid residues, fingerprints and even DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence can still be recovered from the scene of a fire. However, testing of fire debris evidence for multiple forms of evidence has no universally accepted protocol or order of testing. The purpose of this study is two-fold. DNA recovered from simulated fire debris evidence exposed to various ignitable liquids and burn conditions was compared to determine under what scene conditions it could be feasible to recover DNA evidence and generate usable profiles. Additionally, DNA recovered from samples subjected to different time and temperature conditions of heated passive headspace concentration (HPHC) were compared to determine if it was advisable to perform HPHC in an attempt to recover volatile ignitable liquid evidence prior to testing for DNA. The HPHC overall had no significant effect on the degradation or recovered quantities of DNA, and, under the conditions tested, this would not preclude testing for ignitable liquids prior to testing for DNA. The presence of ignitable liquids did not affect the ability to recover DNA or result in degraded DNA, while burning samples prevented DNA from being recovered in all but a few samples, primarily semen samples.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/45550 |
| Date | 31 January 2023 |
| Creators | Galijasevic, Alissa Adrienne |
| Contributors | Hall, Adam B. |
| Source Sets | Boston University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis/Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds