Return to search

Aquatic Invertebrate Consumption by the Major Fish Species in the Blacksmith Fork River

Exponential rates of digestion are described for brown trout and whitefish for July, October, December (1969), and April (1970). The slope of the line fitted to the digestion data from each month was defined as the instantaneous rate of digestion and applied to an exponential growth model to determine the instantaneous consumption rate.
The digestion and consumption rates were applied to field measurements of percent fullness to determine the amount of food material ingested during a 24 hour period. Brown trout consumed 127, 24, 19, and 84 mean percent of their stomach capacity in the July, October, December, and April studies. Whitefish consumed 74, 21, 46, and 51 mean percent of their stomach capacity in the same respective study periods. Mean daily ration from four major collection periods was calculated on fish in the 50 gram to BOO gram size range. Brown trout daily ration varied between 1.35 percent and 2.59 percent. Whitefish daily ration varied between 0.44 percent and 0.83 percent.
Brown trout diets were quite variable with 44 percent of their caloric intake comprised of terrestrial invertebrates in October, 55 percent of the December calories comprised of fish eggs, and 39 percent of the April calories made up of Leptoceridae larvae.
Emerging imagoes were important items in the brown trout diets, contributing as much as 62 percent and not less than 11 percent of the numeric intake for one collection period.
Whitefish did not rely upon emerging imagoes as a significant food source. Their stomachs consistently contained mayflies, chironomids, and caddis larvae. Both fish species occasionally consumed substantial amounts of the large stonefly, Pteronarcys.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UTAHS/oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:etd-4060
Date01 May 1972
CreatorsMeyers, Theodore F.
PublisherDigitalCommons@USU
Source SetsUtah State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
SourceAll Graduate Theses and Dissertations
RightsCopyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu).

Page generated in 0.0526 seconds