Sliding isolation bearings are used widely around the world to minimize damage to structures and their contents during earthquakes. Past studies have typically focused on the behavior of sliding isolation bearing under design conditions; however, as the performance-based earthquake engineering advances, it is necessary and critical to understand the ultimate or even failure behavior, of structural systems under extreme conditions. Using a double friction pendulum bearing with non-articulated slider as an example, this thesis comprehensively investigates the extreme behavior of the sliding bearing components as well as steel frame buildings isolated using these bearings.
This thesis is comprised of two major parts. The first includes numerical and experimental studies of double friction pendulum bearings at the component-level. Finite element investigation shows that depending on the superstructure mass there are two major failure modes for the double friction pendulum bearings. When the superstructure mass is sufficiently large, the failure mode is dominated by the restraining rim yielding; however, when the mass is relatively small, its failure mode shifts to bearing uplift. A simplified analytical model which can directly simulate the impact and uplift behavior of double friction pendulum bearing is also implemented, comparing well to the finite element analysis. Then, to validate the ability of the models to predict extreme behavior as well as to investigate the effect of the restraining rim design, which varies around the world, an experimental study was carried out. Uplift behavior and significant rim yielding were observed during the shake table tests. Moreover, other response parameters, including uplift and shear forces, are evaluated and compared among different rim designs. It is found the restraining rim design has a substantial influence on the bearing’s extreme behavior.
The second part of the thesis investigates the system-level behavior of steel frame buildings isolated with double friction pendulum bearings. It is found that the stiffness of the superstructure largely dictates the system-level failure modes and collapse probability. Initially, bearings with rigid restraining rims are investigated. For flexible moment-resisting frames, the system-level failure modes are mixed: both the bearing uplift and superstructure yielding contribute; also, using current code-minimum design results in acceptably low probability of collapse. However, for stiff concentrically-braced frames, the impact force can impose large ductility demands on the superstructure regardless of its strength. As a result, the system-level failure comes exclusively from superstructure yielding, and only by increasing bearing’s displacement capacity beyond the minimum code allowed can the design meet as acceptably low collapse probability. When flat rims are used instead for the bearing design, the failure modes for both building types are exclusively bearing failure. Furthermore, while it is more apparent for concentrically-braced frames, using flat rims for the bearings can reduce the collapse probability compared to using rigid rims. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/22652 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Bao, Yu |
| Contributors | Becker, Tracy, Civil Engineering |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds