High-ability students will provide future leadership in many fields of endeavour. However, the current practice of educating high-ability students in academically selective classes and schools may not provide the optimum environments for all such students. Big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) research has demonstrated that students in high-ability environments have lower academic self-concepts than equally able students in low-ability settings. Low academic self-concepts are associated with negative educational outcomes. The present investigation aimed to extend current BFLPE theory and research by: (a) testing the BFLPE’s external validity across 41 countries to ascertain the theory’s universality; (b) testing whether the BFLPE is evident in developing countries and in collectivist countries to ascertain whether it transcends cultural and economic barriers; (c) investigating constructs that have the potential to moderate the adverse effects of the BFLPE; (d) elucidating whether upward social comparisons moderate or co-exist with the BFLPE to resolve a conflict in the literature; (e) critically analysing the relation between social comparison processes and the BFLPE to further inform theory; and (f) testing whether the BFLPE varies as a function of ability to clarify its impact on different ability levels. Three studies were conducted to achieve these aims. Study 1 assessed the BFLPE’s external validity and investigated potential BFLPE moderators. Participants were 265,180 15-year-old students who took part in the 2003 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2005a, 2005b). The BFLPE was evident in the entire cross-national sample of 41 culturally and economically diverse countries, and individually in 38. Moderating effects emerged for socio-economic status (SES), individual differences in learning, and individual perceptions of the learning environment. However, in relation to the large sample these effects were considered small. A larger moderating effect emerged for anxiety, where the BFLPE was found to be greater for highly anxious students. Study 2 was designed to resolve an apparent contradiction between the social comparison and the BFLPE literatures. Previously published social comparison data (Blanton, Buunk, Gibbons, and Kuyper, 1999; Huguet, Dumas, Monteil, and Genestoux, 2001) were further analysed to ascertain whether the BFLPE was moderated by, or co-existed with, with the beneficial effects of upward comparisons on performance. Participants were 876 Dutch and 1,156 French students. The BFLPE was moderated for Dutch language, but for all other academic subjects it co-existed with selected upward comparisons. Study 3 assessed the effect of selected comparisons on the BFLPE. Participants were 2,015 French students. The BFLPE was found to co-exist with selected comparisons measured subjectively and when measured objectively for math. The BFLPE was moderated by comparison choice in French when measured objectively and by a performance avoidance goal orientation. The moderating effect of individual ability was tested in all three studies, but provided only small effects, inconsistent in direction. These results define the BFLPE as externally valid and universally applicable and suggest that it is not moderated by selected social comparisons. Results regarding BFLPE moderators offer practical information to inform intervention strategies that may assist high-ability students to reach their full academic potential. / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/185835 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Creators | Seaton, Marjorie, University of Western Sydney, College of Arts, School of Psychology |
| Source Sets | Australiasian Digital Theses Program |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0013 seconds