Return to search

The effects of winter feeding systems on beef cow performance, soil nutrients, crop yield and system economics

A study was conducted on an annual cropped field near Lanigan, Saskatchewan over two years (2005-2006, 2006-2007) to evaluate the effects of three extensive winter feeding systems (bale grazing (BG), swath grazing (SG) and straw-chaff grazing (ST-CH)) and one intensive winter feeding system (drylot (DL)) on cow performance, soil nutrients, crop yield and system cost of production.<p>
Differences in BW (P<0.05) were observed during the 2005-2006 study period with the greatest difference occurring with cows in the SG feeding system. Cows grazing swaths (SG) had a BW loss of 8.0 kg over the 78 d trial period, however these cows consumed 15% less DM and 13% less TDN than cows bale grazing, grazing crop residue or fed in drylot pens. Differences in BW change (P<0.05) were also observed during Yr 2 between the cows fed drylot and cows grazing barley straw-chaff, 32.9 and 6.5 kg, respectively. This difference in body weight change (BW∆) and lower TDN consumption may be attributed to inaccessibility of the straw-chaff feed in the field, due to inclement weather and would suggest a lengthy acclimation period for extensive field grazing systems.<p>
The effects of extensive winter feeding system on soil nutrients and soil structure were determined the following spring after winter grazing. NO3-N levels at the low slope position in the 0-15 cm depth were 53% higher on the BG sites than the ST-CH sites. This may be attributed to the larger concentration of feed, thus feed nutrients, in the BG feeding system. Phosphorus levels on the BG wintering sites were 34% higher than levels in the SG or ST-CH sites. Crop biomass measured on the BG sites was consistent with soil nutrients captured, resulting in a 15% increase in biomass compared to ST-CH and SG sites. Soil nutrient and crop biomass distribution was consistent among winter grazing sites with the ST-CH sites having the most uniform distribution of nutrients and crop biomass, and the BG sites having the least.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:SSU.etd-02022010-224418
Date05 February 2010
CreatorsKelln, Breeanna Maryella
ContributorsLardner, H. A. (Bart)
PublisherUniversity of Saskatchewan
Source SetsLibrary and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-02022010-224418/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds