AND KEY WORDS: Mergers within a group of companies can be divided into three basic variants: a company mergers into its shareholder (up-stream merger), a shareholder-legal entity mergers into its company (down-stream merger), a company mergers into other company given that both companies have at least shareholder in common (merger of sister companies). Capital interconnection of companies makes these mergers to be special and requires a specific regulation. The present regulation of mergers of companies has particular weak points, the gravest is the fact, that the Act on Transformations does not take into account the specifics of the mergers within a group of companies. This entails that in some cases the word-to-word application of the Act on Transformations can lead to harming of shareholders and creditors of the companies participating on the merger. In some cases it leads to an absurd duty to file an application for dissolving of the company while the general meeting is convoked to approve the project of merger. The thesis is dedicated exclusively to the capital aspects of mergers. Therefore I deal with the issues of the amount of the capital stock in the succession company pursuant to the Act on Transformations. I elaborate why it is not possible to apply word-to-word the law on the maximum...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:297523 |
| Date | January 2011 |
| Creators | Kukharchuk, Margarita |
| Contributors | Čech, Petr, Štenglová, Ivanka |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds