The aim of this work is to show the effectiveness of techniques that allow a user to maintain its privacy and anonymity while participating in real word scenario. Users need to communicate with each other in many situations in order to share information. This creates the danger of the user’s privacy being breached and it can discourage users from taking active participation in any information sharing task. There are many real scenarios or application where users want to remain anonymous while having their communication secured. This is so in vehicular communication systems. Group signatures are versatile cryptographic tools that are suitable when we need security and privacy protection. A group signature scheme allows members of a group to sign messages on behalf of the group. Any receiver can verify the message validity but cannot discover the identity of the sender from the signed message or link two or more messages from the same signer. However, the identity of the signer can be discovered by an authority using a signed message. For this reason, Group Signature schemes were proposed in the context of vehicular communication systems. In this context, communication and computation overheads are critical. Thus, the focus of this thesis is to implement and compare different group signature schemes in terms of overhead introduced due to processing cost, and analytically evaluate their suitability for vehicular communication scenarios.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:kth-119816 |
| Date | January 2012 |
| Creators | Agrawal, Vivek |
| Publisher | KTH, Kommunikationsnät |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | EES Examensarbete / Master Thesis ; XR-EE-LCN 2012:017 |
Page generated in 0.0108 seconds