Return to search

Exploring the Perceptions, Practices and Constructs surrounding the Measurement of Dexterity in the Rehabilitation of Persons with Hand and Wrist Injuries / Exploring the Measurement of Dexterity in Rehabilitation

Introduction: Dexterity impairments are common and disabling. Measuring the extent of these impairments is important for care and service provision. Despite this, dexterity is poorly operationalized in the management of persons with hand and wrist conditions (HWC).
Thesis purpose: To understand: 1) how dexterity is defined in the management of persons with HWC and 2) how therapists working with persons with HWC perceive/understand the concept and measurement of dexterity and use of performance-based outcome measures of dexterity (PBOMD).
Methods: In study one, Interpretive Description was used to understand the perceptions and measurement practices of occupational therapists working with persons with HWC in Singapore. Study two involved a content analysis of the literature outlining the constructs measured by PBOMD that were validated for use in persons with HWC.
Results: Both studies highlighted the lack of conceptual clarity around ‘dexterity’ that is reflected in therapists’ and tool developers’ discourse. Many of the therapists we interviewed, perceive PBOMD to lack clinical value. Studies from this thesis suggest that identified PBOMD do not adequately cover dexterity.
Conclusion: Findings highlight the challenges surrounding the construct of dexterity and provide clinical practice recommendations. / Thesis / Master of Science Rehabilitation Science (MSc) / Dexterity is the ability to do tasks, successfully, quickly and accurately. Loss of dexterity is common and affects our ability to do our tasks of daily life and work. Unfortunately, there is a lack of agreement on the best way to measure dexterity. Our study aims to explore what dexterity means to health professionals. We focused on occupational therapists seeing persons with hand and arm injuries. In the first study, we interviewed therapists to understand how they measured dexterity. In the second study, we searched for dexterity tests used with persons with hand injuries. Then, we compared the tests we found to dexterity theories. We found that dexterity is measured in different ways. Therapists faced many barriers to using dexterity tests. Current dexterity tests are an incomplete reflection of a person’s dexterity. The information gained from these studies could be used to inform future research on the measurement of dexterity.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/24888
Date January 2019
CreatorsYong, Joshua
ContributorsMacdermid, Joy, Rehabilitation Science
Source SetsMcMaster University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds