Return to search

Health services delivery options for ECHO Village: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) commonly experience “tri-morbidity,” whereby the effects of physical illness, mental illness, and substance use disorder combine to produce complex healthcare needs. Tiny home villages, or communities comprised of dwellings that are 400-square feet or smaller, have emerged in the U.S. as one option to bridge the gap between living on the street and temporary or permanent shelter. However, whether these communities have been successful in connecting PEH to health services has not been well explored. House of Hope Community Development Corporation sought recommendations for health care services organization and delivery at ECHO Village, a temporary tiny home village in Rhode Island, to meet the health care needs of its clients.
AIMS: (1) To characterize barriers and opportunities to engage PEH in care from the perspective of health care providers using the CDC’s 6 Guiding Principles to a Trauma Informed Approach; (2) to assess the health care priorities and barriers and facilitators to care from the perspective of PEH using the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations, and (3) to inform recommendations for health services delivery for ECHO Village and for similar homelessness service settings more broadly.
METHODS: Literature was reviewed on evidence-based practices for providing health care to PEH, tiny home villages for PEH, and emergency, temporary housing. A matrix was developed to collect and organize descriptive data to select a comparison tiny home village. In Aim 1, 18 in-depth interviews were conducted with health care providers and other key informants in Rhode Island and at Avivo Village, a tiny home village for PEH in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to characterize barriers and opportunities to engage PEH in health care. In Aim 2, 10 in-depth interviews with Avivo Village residents were conducted to identify health care priorities, barriers, and facilitators to care. The 6 Guiding Principles to a Trauma-Informed Approach and the Behavioral Model were used to create initial coding frameworks for provider and resident interviews, respectively. Through an iterative process, codes were refined to aggregate data into patterns of meaning, emerging themes were revealed, and similarities and differences were identified through consensus coding for interpretation purposes. The Behavioral Model was used to assess the role of predisposing, enabling, and needs factors in health services utilization through a structured survey of 93 adults aged ≥18 experiencing homelessness in Rhode Island. Associations between subsistence difficulty and five health utilization outcomes using bivariate tests of survey data were evaluated. Binomial logistic regressions were run to explore the effects of predictor variables on these outcomes.
RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed that the tiny home village setting could facilitate the care of PEH by (1) overcoming many of the common barriers to receiving care for people who had been excluded from traditional shelters and other critical services, (2) affording a sense of safety and security for PEH, and (3) allowing PEH time and space to gain stability to focus on self-identified goals at their own pace. The importance of patient empowerment, peer support, mixed communities in which people in various stages of recovery live together, and non-judgmental providers also emerged as facilitators of care. Quantitative results showed that subsistence difficulty predicted going without needed care for the past 12 months at p <.05. Adjustment for potential confounders did not change our inferences.
CONCLUSION: Several promising practices exist for health service organization and delivery in the tiny home village setting that can be replicated, scaled, and sustained regardless of model or service mix. Given the significant barriers to accessing healthcare faced by PEH, the tiny home village setting can serve as an effective engagement point for PEH, particularly for those averse to traditional shelters or care settings. / 2024-07-05T00:00:00Z

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/46423
Date05 July 2023
CreatorsNoguchi, Julia Emiko
ContributorsMcInnes, Donald K.
Source SetsBoston University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis/Dissertation
RightsAttribution 4.0 International, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Page generated in 0.0019 seconds