This research comprises an in-depth study to construct a strategic framework for research in Sport and Exercise Medicine at the University of the Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM) is a young academic discipline in South Africa. Internationally, the status, training, research and level of service delivery in SEM are spread out over a broad spectrum, from a well established and highly specialised medical specialty in certain countries, down to relative obscurity with lack of recognition in mainstream medicine and without specialty status in others. Research is the ideal focus area which will advance the status and recognition of SEM in South Africa and elsewhere, as well as increase the evidence base for SEM, both locally and internationally. A need for relevant research in SEM in South Africa has been recognized. The University of the Free State (UFS) has a young SEM programme, which needs to grow and gain local, national and, eventually, international recognition to make a meaningful contribution to the discipline of SEM. Furthermore, the UFS has embarked on a journey to increase its research outputs and status considerably over the next five to ten years. These conditions provide a golden opportunity to establish a research programme of excellence in SEM at the UFS. Against this background, the problem that was addressed is a lack of co-ordinated, publishable research in the Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM) disciplines at the UFS, despite many opportunities that are presented. In addition, a relative need for strategic research planning in sport sciences in South Africa and internationally has been recognized. The overall goal of the study was therefore to facilitate high quality, published research in SEM with the view to improve the scientific grounding of the discipline. In order to achieve this goal, the specific aim of the study was to do a critical situation-based analysis of Sport and Exercise Medicine and relevant factors in research and research management, with the view to compile a strategic framework for the development of a research programme in SEM at the UFS. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods were utilised in the study and used in complementary fashion. The methods comprised a literature review, semi-structured interviews and a Delphi survey to determine the key components of the eventual strategic framework. All respondents in the empirical part of the study gave informed consent to participate. Pre-testing of the interview guide and the Delphi questionnaire were done by means of pilot studies. These processes were followed to ensure scientific validity, reliability and trustworthiness of the study. The literature review provided relevant insights into aspects of SEM and SEM research; leadership, management and strategic planning; academic research management; principles of research; as well as strategies and policies influencing research at the UFS. With the literature review as foundation, semi-structured interviews were conducted with current academic role players in SEM at the UFS, as well as with research managers at the UFS, to investigate the practical applications of theory and policy in research at the UFS, to identify challenges in research at the UFS, and to obtain the views of current role players on aspects of a multidisciplinary research framework in SEM at the UFS. Thirteen participants were selected for the semi-structured interviews by means of purposive and sequential sampling methods. The questions in the semi-structured interviews comprised seven categories, namely the status, role and place of SEM at the UFS; stakeholders in SEM research; research strategy; challenges in research; skills, knowledge and status of researchers and research leaders; suggested components of a strategic framework in SEM research; and an open category which invited any further relevant comments. Due to their semi-structured nature, the data obtained from interviews were mostly qualitative, but with quantitative elements.
The results of the semi-structured interviews were categorised, analysed and collated in tables. These results were used in the context of the literature review, to construct a Delphi questionnaire which was used in a Delphi process with a panel of national and international experts in SEM research and in research management. The Delphi technique is a method for the collection of opinion on a particular topic, particularly the opinions of experts on the topic at hand. It was therefore chosen as an appropriate tool to test the results of interviews with local experts as interpreted according to the literature, on a panel of experts. The participants in the Delphi process were carefully selected to include national and international experts in SEM education and research, as well as policy-makers, leaders and managers in research. The selected international experts were globally representative. The panel consisted of ten experts. The Delphi questionnaire was constructed in accordance with the semi-structured interviews, but categorised in the sequence of the program logic model of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, on which the final strategic framework was developed. The categories comprised strategic foundations of a research framework in SEM; the role, place and character of research in SEM at a university; inputs and processes required, challenges expected and outputs envisaged; as well as the expected impact or significance of a research programme in SEM at the UFS and possible ways to measure the progress of the programme. The results of the Delphi survey were analysed and the findings presented and discussed. The final outcome of the study, a strategic framework for research in SEM at the UFS, was created by triangulation of the critical analysis of SEM research and other relevant themes in the literature review, the results of the semi-structured interviews, and the results of the Delphi survey. In the final product, the premises, principles, points of departure and required resources for the development of a strategic framework for a research programme in SEM at the UFS were presented. Detailed formulations of inputs, processes and outputs of the programme were put forward, to culminate in a sustainable research programme. In conclusion of the study, final conclusions were drawn, limitations of the study addressed and recommendations made. The researcher believes that this study will make a unique contribution to the research, further development, and ultimately the status of Sport and Exercise Medicine at the University of the Free State and in South Africa. The challenges identified in the study and the complexities of research development have not gone unnoticed. These challenges will be addressed with passion and determination towards the attainment of the ultimate goal which inspired the study.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ufs/oai:etd.uovs.ac.za:etd-11212012-094614 |
| Date | 21 November 2012 |
| Creators | Holtzhausen, Louis Johannes |
| Contributors | Prof MM Nel, Prof GJ van Zyl |
| Publisher | University of the Free State |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en-uk |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.uovs.ac.za//theses/available/etd-11212012-094614/restricted/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University Free State or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0244 seconds