Organized medicine is a uniquely powerful political force in Canada, with physician
colleges and associations exerting extensive influence over healthcare provision. Their
influence has contributed to what social scientists describe as medical dominance, or the exceptional power of the medical profession within the healthcare system and wider
society. However, Canadian medical organizations do not consistently defend this
dominance; rather, they have occasionally lent support to policy changes that, on their
face, would appear incompatible with traditional conceptions of medical power and
authority.
Typically, these instances are explained as a simple matter of strategic retreat: medicine
conceding defeat on a particular issue in an effort to save face or conserve resources,
without any change in underlying beliefs. This dissertation questions that assumption,
asking if at times organized medicine’s support for threats to medical dominance is
instead a function of more fundamental shifts in core policy beliefs. Through a series of
interviews exploring how organized medicine responded to the re-emergence of
midwifery and expansions of pharmacy scope in four provinces (Alberta, Ontario,
Quebec and Nova Scotia), the analysis determines that, while medicine only supported
expanded pharmacy scope out of strategic retreat, there are signs of more substantive
shifts in belief with respect to midwifery. This suggests that the relationship between
organized medicine and traditional medical dominance is more flexible and dynamic than has been assumed.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:uottawa.ca/oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/39662 |
| Date | 26 September 2019 |
| Creators | Diepeveen, Benjamin |
| Contributors | Orsini, Michael, Turgeon, Luc |
| Publisher | Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa |
| Source Sets | Université d’Ottawa |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds