Abstract Introduction: The perception of quality of life (QoL) in patients with implantable cardiac devices including implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), followed by telemonitoring care (Home Monitoring HM), has recently become an extremely hot topic due to constantly increasing number of patients wearing these devices. This increase has resulted in an increased demand for safe, prompt, and more effective out-patient care. Methods: Our research was carried out between December 2016 and March 2017. A cohort of 150 consecutive patients with ICD, followed using the Home Monitoring system (HM+), and 150 consecutive patients with ICD, followed using conventional in-office check-ups (HM-), was retrospectively drawn from the Ceske Budejovice Hospital Patient Information System. A questionnaire, which specifically addressed QoL (EQ5D), level of anxiety and depression (HADS), and a custom questionnaire examining the relationship between patients and the HM system and telecare workflow, was sent out to all patients. Results: For the final statistical analysis, 91 (60.7%) and 104 (69.3%) of the questionnaires were used from the HM+ and HM- groups, respectively. Our results showed that the method of ICD device follow-up did not directly influence QoL. Our statistical comparison of the data did not show any difference between HM+ and HM- patients. A non-significant trend towards better QoL in HM+ compared to HM- patients was noted based on total QoL scores from the EQ5D questionnaire (68.6 ? 19 vs. 64.6 ? 16.5, p = 0.09). Regarding anxiety and depression, statistical testing also failed to find any difference between HM+ and HM- patients. However, more than half of the patients in both groups were in the "normal" population range with respect to anxiety and depression. The most striking difference between HM+ and HM- patients was noted in the preference for the type of follow-up: while 54.9% of HM- patients expressed an interest in remote follow-up and 45.1% said they preferred in-office check-ups, only 6.7% (p < 0.0001) of HM+ patients expressed an interest in switching to in-office check-ups with personal contact instead of remote monitoring. Willingness to partially cover the financial costs of telecare was similar in both groups. HM+ patients were more inclined to use remote ICD monitoring (p = 0.007) and had a more positive attitude toward the telecare approach overall, compared to HM- patients (p = 0.034). Conclusion: The method of device follow-up does not significantly affect QoL in patients with ICD devices, nor does it affect levels of anxiety and depression. Generally, patients with ICDs followed using the HM system were very satisfied with telecare and would prefer not to lose remote ICD monitoring. Although, the willingness to, at least partially, cover the costs of the HM system was limited and comparable to that of patients receiving conventional follow-up.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:320689 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | ŠAFAŘÍKOVÁ, Iva |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds