For people who are blind or have low vision (BLV), physical barriers and negative experiences related to using current transportation options can have negative impacts on quality of life. The emergence of levels 4 – 5 automated driving system-dedicated vehicles (L4+ ADS), which will not require human operators to provide any input into the dynamic driving task, could empower the BLV community by providing an independent means of transportation. Yet, the BLV community has concerns that their needs are not being adequately considered by those currently developing L4+ ADSs, which will result in this technology being inaccessible to populations that it would otherwise greatly benefit. The current study sought to address this gap in the literature by explicitly evaluating the information and interactions that BLV riders will require from L4+ ADS. Specifically, we collected focus group and empirical data across three studies on BLV riders' information and interaction requirements for L4+ ADSs across expected and unexpected driving scenarios as well as pick-up and drop-off tasks (PUDO).
Through focus groups with sighted (n = 11) and BLV participants (n = 11; Study 1), we identified similarities and differences between sighted and BLV participants in terms of their user needs for L4+ ADSs across five challenging driving scenarios. Next, we examined BLV participants' (n = 13; Study 2) information requests in real-world settings to better understand BLV riders' needs during a simulated L4+ ADS experience. Our findings show that BLV riders want information that helps with (a) orienting to important objects in the environment during PUDO, (b) determining their location while riding in the ADS, and (c) understanding the ADSs' actions. Finally, we developed an HMI prototype using BLV riders' feedback in Studies 1 and 2 and had BLV participants engage with it during a simulated L4+ ADS trip (n = 12; Study 3). Our results suggest that BLV riders value information about nearby landmarks in familiar and unfamiliar areas, as well as explanations for ADS's actions during ordinary and unexpected scenarios. Additionally, BLV riders need information about required walking distances and presence of tripping hazards in order to select a drop-off location.
Taken together, our studies show that BLV riders have specific requirements that L4+ ADS must meet in order for this to be an accessible means of transportation. In light of these findings, we generated 28 guidelines and 44 recommendations that could be used by designers to improve the accessibility of L4+ ADSs for BLV riders. / Doctor of Philosophy / When using current transportation options, individuals who are blind or have low vision (BLV) often encounter physical barriers and negative experiences, which can limit their ability to travel independently and have negative impacts on their overall quality of life. However, future vehicles equipped with levels 4 – 5 automated driving systems (L4+ ADSs) will offer transportation that requires no input from human operators, and thus, could be used as an independent means of transportation for the BLV community. Unfortunately, the BLV community has concerns that their needs are not being adequately considered by those currently developing L4+ ADSs, which will result in this technology being inaccessible to populations that it would otherwise greatly benefit. The current work sought to address this gap in the literature by evaluating the information and interactions that BLV riders will require from L4+ ADS.
We conducted three studies to collected data on BLV riders' information and interaction requirements for L4+ ADSs across a variety of driving scenarios as well as tasks relating to being picked up and dropped-off by an L4+ ADS. First, through focus groups with sighted and BLV participants, we identified similarities and differences between sighted and BLV participants' user needs for L4+ ADSs across five challenging driving scenarios. Next, to better understand BLV riders' needs, we had BLV participants indicate when they would desire information during a simulated L4+ ADS ride-hailing experience in real-world settings. Our findings show that BLV riders want information that helps with (a) orienting to important objects in the environment during PUDO, (b) determining their location during their trip, and (c) understanding the reason for the ADS's actions. Finally, using BLV riders' feedback, we developed an HMI prototype and had BLV participants engage with it during a simulated L4+ ADS trip. Our results suggest that BLV riders value information about nearby landmarks in both familiar and unfamiliar areas, as well as explanations for ADS's actions during common (e.g., stopping at a stop sign) and unexpected driving scenarios (e.g., sudden swerve). Additionally, when being dropped off, BLV riders need information about required walking distances and presence of tripping hazards in order to select a desirable drop-off location.
Taken together, our studies show that BLV riders have specific requirements that L4+ ADS must meet in order for this to be an accessible means of transportation. In light of these findings, we generated a set of guidelines and recommendations that designers can use to improve the accessibility of L4+ ADSs for BLV riders.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/116007 |
| Date | 08 August 2023 |
| Creators | Bloomquist, Eric Tait |
| Contributors | Industrial and Systems Engineering, Gabbard, Joseph L., Doerzaph, Zachary R., Large, David R., Jeon, Myounghoon |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds