Return to search

Detection of insect and fungal damage and incidence of sprouting in stored wheat using near-infrared hyperspectral and digital color imaging

Wheat grain quality is defined by several parameters, of which insect and fungal damage and sprouting are considered important degrading factors. At present, Canadian wheat is inspected and graded manually by Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) inspectors at grain handling facilities or in the CGC laboratories. Visual inspection methods are time consuming, less efficient, subjective, and require experienced personnel. Therefore, an alternative, rapid, objective, accurate, and cost effective technique is needed for grain quality monitoring in real-time which can potentially assist or replace the manual inspection process. Insect-damaged wheat samples by the species of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae), lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica), rusty grain beetle (Cryptolestes ferrugineus), and red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum); fungal-damaged wheat samples by the species of storage fungi namely Penicillium spp., Aspergillus glaucus, and Aspergillus niger; and artificially sprouted wheat kernels were obtained from the Cereal Research Centre (CRC), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Winnipeg, Canada. Field damaged sprouted (midge-damaged) wheat kernels were procured from five growing locations across western Canada. Healthy and damaged wheat kernels were imaged using a long-wave near-infrared (LWNIR) and a short-wave near-infrared (SWNIR) hypersprctral imaging systems and an area scan color camera. The acquired images were stored for processing, feature extraction, and algorithm development. The LWNIR classified 85-100% healthy and insect-damaged, 95-100% healthy and fungal-infected, and 85-100% healthy and sprouted/midge-damaged kernels. The SWNIR classified 92.7-100%, 96-100% and 93.3-98.7% insect, fungal, and midge-damaged kernels, respectively (up to 28% false positive error). Color imaging correctly classified 93.7-99.3%, 98-100% and 94-99.7% insect, fungal, and midge-damaged kernels, respectively (up to 26% false positive error). Combined the SWNIR features with top color image features correctly classified 91-100%, 99-100% and 95-99.3% insect, fungal, and midge- damaged kernels, respectively with only less than 4% false positive error.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:MANITOBA/oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/3217
Date14 September 2009
CreatorsSingh, Chandra B.
ContributorsJayas, Digvir S.(Biosystems Engineering) Paliwal, Jitendra(Biosystems Engineering), White, Noel D.G.(Biosystems Engineering) Thomas, Gabriel (Electrical and Computer Engineering) Sokhansanj, Shahab (Chemical & Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia)
Source SetsUniversity of Manitoba Canada
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds