Return to search

The Role of Injury Mechanism in Neurogenesis Following Repeated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Dentate Gyrus

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for approximately 73-83% of all traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and continues to be a serious clinical challenge [1]. The role of injury mechanism in TBI has been widely debated, and it is believed that although there are differences between diffuse and focal TBI, the resulting injury is not influenced by the way in which it was acquired [1], [2]. It is known that TBIs can cause cognitive impairments that are often due to injury experienced in the hippocampus [2]. In response to insult, quiescent neural stem cell (NSC) populations within the dentate gyrus region of the hippocampus become activated. Stem cell differentiation following injury is hypothesized to be unique for diffuse and impact TBIs, primarily due to the differences in mechanotransduction pathways triggered by each respective injury. By quantifying the lineage of stem cells through immunohistochemistry, this study examined the dentate gyrus following mTBI in a rodent model, and the contribution that injury mechanism plays in mTBI outcomes. Additionally, the behavioral effects of mTBI were assessed through open field testing at 72 hours and four weeks following injury. Overall, these findings indicated that after four weeks following mTBI, there are not significant differences between impact and blast both from an immunohistochemical and behavioral standpoint. Despite there being few differences between injury groups, these findings help clarify the role of injury mechanism not only in the context of neurogenesis, but they also inform future studies addressing preventative and treatment strategies for mTBI. / Master of Science / Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for approximately 73-83% of all traumatic brain injuries (TBI) [1]. There are two main ways in which a mTBI can occur: through diffuse or focal injury. A diffuse injury is due to the brain experiencing a force that does not physically come into contact with the head, such as a shockwave from an explosion. These types of injuries typically affect the entire head. Impact injuries on the other hand, are caused by the head encountering an object at a force that causes injury to the brain. These injuries tend to be focal, as the entire head rarely comes into contact with an object. Both diffuse and focal injuries can cause mTBI, and there is a current debate questioning if the mode of injury has an impact on the damage experienced by the brain [1], [2]. However, it is also known that mTBI can cause cognitive impairments such as changes in behavior, memory, and even mental health, which can occur in the hippocampus of the brain [2]. Within the hippocampus, there is a small subset of cells referred to as neural stem cells (NSC) that become active following injury. The activation of these cells is believed to be in response to injury in the brain. Furthermore, NSCs have the ability to differentiate into various cell types within the brain, including astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and neurons. Each of these cell types perform an integral role in the function of the brain. It is hypothesized that the response of NSCs in the hippocampus is unique depending on if an injury was acquired through diffuse or impact mechanisms. To investigate this, the lineage of NSCs was quantified within the hippocampus following blast and impact mTBI in a rodent model. Additionally, the behavioral effects of diffuse and impact injury were investigated at 72 hours and four weeks following injury. Despite there being no significant differences in outcomes between injury groups, these findings help clarify the role of injury mechanism not only in the context of NSC response, but they also inform future studies addressing preventative and treatment strategies for mTBI.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/115275
Date31 May 2023
CreatorsWilkes, Jessica Meredith
ContributorsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, VandeVord, Pamela J., Verbridge, Scott, Theus, Michelle H.
PublisherVirginia Tech
Source SetsVirginia Tech Theses and Dissertation
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
FormatETD, application/pdf, application/pdf
RightsIn Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds