Background: The right ventricle (RV) is multi-compartmental in orientation with a complex structural geometry. However, assessment of this part of the heart has remained an elusive clinical challenge. As a matter of fact, its importance has been underestimated in the past, especially its role as a determinant of cardiac symptoms, exercise capacity in chronic heart failure and survival in patients with valvular disease of the left heart. Evidence also exists that pulmonary hypertension (PH) affects primarily the right ventricular function. On the other hand, previous literature suggested that severe aortic stenosis (AS) affects left ventricular (LV) structure and function which partially recover after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the impact of that on RV global and segmental function remains undetermined. Objectives: We sought to gain more insight into the RV physiology using 3D technology, Speckle tracking as well as already applicable echocardiographic measures. Our first aim was to assess the normal differential function of the RV inflow tract (IT), apical and outflow tract (OT) compartments, also their interrelations and the response to pulmonary hypertension. We also investigated the extent of RV dysfunction in severe AS and its response to AVR. Lastly, we studied the extent of global and regional right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary hypertension of different aetiologies and normal LV function. Methods: The studies were performed on three different groups; (1) left sided heart failure with (Group 1) and without (Group 2) secondary pulmonary hypertension, (2) severe aortic stenosis and six months post AVR and (3) pulmonary hypertension of different aetiologies and normal left ventricular function. We used 3D, speckle tracking echocardiography and conventionally available Doppler echocardiographic transthoracic techniques including M-mode, 2D and myocardial tissue Doppler. All patients’ measurements were compared with healthy subjects (controls). Statistics were performed using a commercially available SPSS software. Results: 1- Our RV 3D tripartite model was validated with 2D measures and eventually showed strong correlations between RV inflow diameter (2D) and end diastolic volume (3D) (r=0.69, p<0.001) and between tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV ejection fraction (3D) (r=0.71, p<0.001). In patients (group 1 & 2) we found that the apical ejection fraction (EF) was less than the inflow and outflow (controls: p<0.01 & p<0.01, Group 1: p<0.05 & p<0.01 and Group 2: p<0.05 & p<0.01, respectively). Ejection fraction (EF) was reduced in both patient groups (p<0.05 for all compartments). Whilst in controls, the inflow compartment reached the minimum volume 20 ms before the outflow and apex, in Group 2 it was virtually simultaneous. Both patient groups showed prolonged isovolumic contraction (IVC) and relaxation (IVR) times (p<0.05 for all). Also, in controls, the outflow tract was the only compartment where the rate of volume fall correlated with the time to peak RV ejection (r = 0.62, p = 0.03). In Group 1, this relationship was lost and became with the inflow compartment (r = 0.61, p = 0.01). In Group 2, the highest correlation was with the apex (r=0.60, p<0.05), but not with the outflow tract. 2- In patients with severe aortic stenosis, time to peak RV ejection correlated with the basal cavity segment (r = 0.72, p<0.001) but not with the RVOT. The same pattern of disturbance remained after 6 months of AVR (r = 0.71, p<0.001). In contrast to the pre-operative and post-operative patients, time to RV peak ejection correlated with the time to peak outflow tract strain rate (r = 0.7, p<0.001), but not with basal cavity function. Finally in patients, RVOT strain rate (SR) did not change after AVR but basal cavity SR fell (p=0.04). 3- In patients with pulmonary hypertension of different aetiologies and normal LV function, RV inflow and outflow tracts were dilated (p<0.001 for both). Furthermore, TAPSE (p<0.001), inflow velocities (p<0.001), basal and mid-cavity strain rate (SR) and longitudinal displacement (p<0.001 for all) were all reduced. The time to peak systolic SR at basal, mid-cavity (p<0.001 for both) and RVOT (p=0.007) was short as was that to peak displacement (p<0.001 for all). The time to peak pulmonary ejection correlated with time to peak SR at RVOT (r=0.7, p<0.001) in controls, but with that of the mid cavity in patients (r=0.71, p<0.001). Finally, pulmonary ejection acceleration (PAc) was faster (p=0.001) and RV filling time shorter in patients (p=0.03) with respect to controls. Conclusion: RV has distinct features for the inflow, apical and outflow tract compartments, with different extent of contribution to the overall systolic function. In PH, RV becomes one dyssynchronous compartment which itself may have perpetual effect on overall cardiac dysfunction. In addition, critical aortic stenosis results in RV configuration changes with the inflow tract, rather than outflow tract, determining peak ejection. This pattern of disturbance remains six month after valve replacement, which confirms that once RV physiology is disturbed it does not fully recover. The findings of this study suggest an organised RV remodelling which might explain the known limited exercise capacity in such patients. Furthermore, in patients with PH of different aetiologies and normal LV function, there is a similar pattern of RV disturbance. Therefore, we can conclude that early identification of such changes might help in identifying patients who need more aggressive therapy early on in the disease process.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:umu-66725 |
| Date | January 2013 |
| Creators | Calcutteea, Avin |
| Publisher | Umeå universitet, Medicin, Umeå : Umeå university |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | Umeå University medical dissertations, 0346-6612 ; 1551 |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds