Latent Gaussian models (LGMs) are perhaps the most commonly used class of statistical models with broad applications in various fields, including biostatistics, econometrics, and spatial modeling. LGMs assume that a set of unobserved or latent variables follow a Gaussian distribution, commonly used to model spatial and temporal dependence in the data. The availability of computational tools, such as R-INLA, that permit fast and accurate estimation of LGMs has made their use widespread. Nevertheless, it is easy to find datasets that contain inherently non-Gaussian features, such as sudden jumps or spikes, that adversely affect the inferences and predictions made from an LGM. These datasets require more general latent non-Gaussian models (LnGMs) that can automatically handle these non-Gaussian features by assuming more flexible and robust non-Gaussian distributions on the latent variables. However, fast implementation and easy-to-use software are lacking, which prevents LnGMs from becoming widely applicable.
This dissertation aims to tackle these challenges and provide ready-to-use implementations for the R-INLA package. We view scientific learning as an iterative process involving model criticism followed by model improvement and robustification. Thus, the first step is to provide a framework that allows researchers to criticize and check the adequacy of an LGM without fitting the more expensive LnGM. We employ concepts from Bayesian sensitivity analysis to check the influence of the latent Gaussian assumption on the statistical answers and Bayesian predictive checking to check if the fitted LGM can predict important features in the data. In many applications, this procedure will suffice to justify using an LGM. For cases where this check fails, we provide fast and scalable implementations of LnGMs based on variational Bayes and Laplace approximations. The approximation leads to an LGM that downweights extreme events in the latent variables, reducing their impact and leading to more robust inferences. Each step, the first of LGM criticism and the second of LGM robustification, can be executed in R-INLA, requiring only the addition of a few lines of code. This results in a robust workflow that applied researchers can readily use.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:kaust.edu.sa/oai:repository.kaust.edu.sa:10754/692332 |
| Date | 28 May 2023 |
| Creators | Cabral, Rafael |
| Contributors | Rue, Haavard, Bolin, David, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Science and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Huser, Raphaël, Mira,Antonietta, Tempone, Raul |
| Source Sets | King Abdullah University of Science and Technology |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Relation | N/A |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds