Low-code development is an alternative to regular software development where the developer is able to build software and websites using a drag and drop interface instead of writing code. Low-code development has gained popularity in recent years, one of the reasons for this is the broader targeted audience which is citizen developers, people with no previous knowledge and experience in programming and web development. However it is unclear if low-code development can uphold the standards set by software development best practices. The purpose of this study is to investigate how low-code development corresponds to best practices in software development. Maintainability, flexibility, portability, reusability, readability, and testability are the six best practices that are specifically investigated in this study. Design and creation was used as the methodology to investigate whether these best practices can be used in low-code development. A system and a website was built in partnership with CGI, using Microsoft Power Platform as the low-code development tool. The findings of the study indicate that low-code development has a number of limitations when compared to best practices in software development. The limited ability to customize code makes it difficult to accomplish maintainability, flexibility, and testability in low-code development. Additionally, it might be challenging to accomplish portability because low-code development platforms are not always interoperable, and reusability is limited due to the differences in implementation between platforms. Furthermore, it is often difficult to follow the logic flow of a low-code system which makes readability a challenge in low-code development. While some best practices can be adapted to low-code development, the study draws the conclusion that low-code development still has a long way to go before it can fully live up to best practices in software development. In summary, this study highlights the limitations of low-code development in comparison to best practices for software development and proposes that additional research is required to overcome these limitations.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:mau-60465 |
| Date | January 2023 |
| Creators | Evans, William, Petersson, Benny |
| Publisher | Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för teknik och samhälle (TS) |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds