<p>Abstract</p><p>The purpose of this study were to examine the appeal that reaches the county administrative court regarding cases within The law of support and service to some disabled (LSS) the third "alternative" with the effort personal assistant. We have gathered 280 cases from seven different county administrative court and from our selection 19 of the cases remained.</p><p>These 19 cases became our starting point for our study and they have been interpreted through Foucault´s and Skau´s interpretation frame regarding power and Payne´s social constructivism to try and answer our three questions at issue: How are the cases being handled by the county administrative court? What kind of cases leads to appeal? What similarity and differences are there between the cases? These questions have been answered one by one in a systematical order. Our result shows, among other things, that cases that involve certificates from occupational therapist or physiotherapist are the cases that win against the municipality in the county administrative court. Further we have found a new theme in our study regarding clientification among them who apply for efforts within LSS and "alternative" three. The new theme shows that individuals often clientifies themselfs to be able to take part of the wellfairstates aid, they enhance their disabilities.</p><p>Keywords: County administrative court, municipality, LSS, case and certificates</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:mdh-9974 |
| Date | January 2010 |
| Creators | Kristian, Josefsson, Pia, Ekman |
| Publisher | Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, text |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds