Class of 2015 Abstract / Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro performance of various pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) formulations by cascade impaction primarily focusing on throat deposition, fine particle fraction (FPF), and mass-median aerodynamic diameter (MMADR) measurements
Methods: Ten solution pMDIs were prepared with varying cosolvent species in either low (8% w/w) or high (20% w/w) concentration. The chosen cosolvents were either alcohol (ethanol, n-propanol) or acetate (methyl-, ethyl-, and butyl acetate) in chemical nature. All formulations used HFA-134a propellant and 0.3% drug. The pMDIs were tested by cascade impaction with three different inlets to determine the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), throat deposition, and FPF of each formulation. Theoretical droplet evaporation time (DET), a measure of volatility, for each formulation was calculated using the MMADR.
Results: Highly volatile formulations with short DET showed consistently lower throat deposition and higher FPF than their lower volatility counterparts when using volume-constrained inlets. However, FPF values were not significantly different for pMDI testing with a non-constrained inlet. The MMADR values generated with volume-constrained inlets did not show any discernible trends, but MMADR values from the non-constrained inlet correlated with DET.
Conclusions: Formulations with shorter DET exhibit lower throat deposition and higher FPF, indicating potentially better inhalational performance over formulations with longer DET. There appear to be predictable trends relating both throat deposition and FPF to DET. The shift in MMADR values for volume-constrained inlets suggests that large diameter drug particles are preferentially collected in these inlets.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/614123 |
Date | January 2015 |
Creators | Matthew Grimes, Myrdal, Paul, Sheth, Poonam |
Contributors | Myrdal, Paul, Sheth, Poonam, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona |
Publisher | The University of Arizona. |
Source Sets | University of Arizona |
Language | en_US |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text, Electronic Report |
Rights | Copyright © is held by the author. |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds