Return to search

Evaluation of the clinical outcome of curvilinear transport distraction osteogenesis and revascularised fibula free flaps in the reconstruction of large post-maxillectomy defects

Background: Maxillary defects caused by trauma or tumour resection in the head and neck region can be devastating to the patient from a cosmetic and functional perspective. Patients who undergo maxillectomy procedures experience a substantial deterioration in their primary oral functions such as breathing, mastication, salivation, deglutition and phonation, which has a collective adverse influence on their quality of life (QOL). The revascularised free fibula flap (RFFF) has been demonstrated to be most reliable for the reconstruction of maxillary defects, and has been regarded as the 'gold standard.' A novel method of regenerating bone and soft tissue through the process of curvilinear transport distraction oseteogenesis (CTDO) has been developed and compared with the RFFF technique. Method: A prospective cohort study of 6 post-maxillectomy patients was compared regarding the clinical outcome of function and aesthetics with a group of 6 patients who had undergone RFFF reconstruction. The new bone (regenerate) was compared with the parent bone from which it had been generated. Objective measuring tools were employed to assess pre and post quality of life (QOL) aspects. The RFFF patients were not subjected to any invasive procedures save to undergo a clinical evaluation and undergo a CT scan of their maxillae. A cohort of 6 participants was treated prospectively using CTDO and the results were analysed within that cohort. These results were compared with a retrospective group of 6 participants of similar age and gender distribution who had undergone RFFF reconstruction as an external control. The patented Hendricks-Vicatos (H-V) maxillary transport distractor was applied to all selected participants by the primary investigator under general anaesthesia at Groote Schuur Hospital or a private clinic. The H-V maxillary transport distractor (5 prototypes) was pre-shaped and pre-fitted onto a 3-D model of the participant's maxilla, in a laboratory. This method reduced clinical installation time. If teeth were present in the area to be distracted, then at least 2 teeth were removed from the maxilla, preferably three months before the date of distraction. In the first few cases, this was the protocol for developing bone stock. This protocol was revised in the last 2 patients of the study, where no teeth were extracted at all. A linear fracture (bi-cortical) was created in the maxilla in a vertical direction (segmentally) to develop a mobile, well-vascularised transport disc. This carrier disc was attached to the metal plate of the 'crawler' via small titanium screws. The crawler was then moved on the reconstruction plate (BiometTM Zimmer Biomet,

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uct/oai:localhost:11427/25290
Date January 2017
CreatorsHendricks, Mogamat Rushdi
ContributorsVicatos, George, Hudson, Donald
PublisherUniversity of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeDoctoral Thesis, Doctoral, PhD
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds