Return to search

Variables influencing family members' decisions regarding continued placement of family members with mental disabilities in one state-operated institution

The purpose of the study is to identify variables influencing family members’
decisions regarding continued placement of family members with mental disabilities in
state-operated mental retardation institutions.
This study was conducted during the spring and summer of 2006 (March through
July). The participants were 51 family members of residents residing in one stateoperated
institution. The survey questionnaire used in this study was developed using
several similar questionnaires found in the literature as a guide. Of the 17 questions, two
were taken from the Survey of Families with a Developmentally Disabled Family
Member by Tausig (1985); and two were taken from the Survey of Parents of Children
with Developmental Disabilities by Sherman (1988). The remaining questions were
generated and modified from the National Survey of the Families of Institutionalized
Mentally Retarded Persons by Spreat, Telles, Conroy, Feinstein, and Colombatto (1987).
All three questionnaires used were designed to assess families’ perceptions of residential
services. Descriptive statistics were used to report personal characteristics of family
members, and correlation techniques were used to measure relationships between and
among characteristics of family members and their decisions to both seek and maintain
placement of their family member with mental disabilities in a state-operated institution.
Major findings are:
1. Respondents were more likely to seek initial placement in a state mental
retardation institution, a) because their family member with the mental disability could
receive more intensive care and/or specialized programs in the institution, and b)
because they were advised by physicians and/or other medical and professional
specialists.
2. The need for a more protected place/secure environment was very important to
family members when deciding to seek initial placement.
3. Current placement was maintained because their family member with the
mental disability could receive more intensive care or specialized programs in the
institution.
4. The need for 24-hour supervision that could provide for a more protected
environment was reported as a reason for the decision to maintain their current
placements.
5. Respondents indicated they were satisfied with services provided at the
residential facility; and the need for facility, social and physical/health supports were
important factors that determined family members’ choices to maintain placement.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1094
Date15 May 2009
CreatorsColvin, Alex Don
ContributorsLarke, Patricia J.
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Dissertation, text
Formatelectronic, application/pdf, born digital

Page generated in 0.0138 seconds