Return to search

Do Monetary Incentives Matter in Classroom Experiments? Effects on Course Performance

Using 641 principles of economics students across four universities, the authors examine whether providing monetary incentives in a prisoner's dilemma game enhances student learning as measured by a set of common exam questions. Subjects either play a two-player prisoner's dilemma game for real money, play the same game with no money at stake (i.e., play a hypothetical version), or are in a control group where no game is played. The authors find strong evidence that students who played the classroom game for real money earned higher test scores than students who played the hypothetical game or where no game was played. Their findings challenge the conventional wisdom that monetary incentives are unnecessary in classroom experiments.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ETSU/oai:dc.etsu.edu:etsu-works-16902
Date01 January 2015
CreatorsRousu, Matthew C., Corrigan, Jay R., Harris, David, Hayter, Jill K., Houser, Scott, Lafrancois, Becky A., Onafowora, Olugbenga, Colson, Gregory, Hoffer, Adam
PublisherDigital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
Source SetsEast Tennessee State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
SourceETSU Faculty Works

Page generated in 0.0012 seconds