<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in amplitude between M-response from m. Abductor pollicis brevis/m. Pronator quadratus and m. Abductor pollicis brevis/m. Abductor digiti minimi on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, compared with control subjects. We wanted to see if m. Pronator quadratus is a better alternative than m. Abductor digiti minimi as comparison with m. Abductor pollicis brevis on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p>Nerve conduction studies were performed on 20 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and on 31 healthy subjects.</p><p>The test-retest result shows that this method was reproducible. The amplitude difference of m. Abductor pollicis brevis-m. Abductor digiti minimi, for the patients, was 1,5mV lower and the amplitude for m. Abductor pollicis brevis-m. Pronator quadratus was 2mV lower than for healthy subjects. Two of the patients were outside the 2SD for the m. Abductor pollicis brevis-m. Pronator quadratus difference but not on the m. Abductor pollicis brevis-m. Abductor digiti minimi. This may indicate that m. Pronator quadratus was better than m. Abductor digiti minimi in the comparison with the m. Abductor pollicis brevis amplitude.</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:uu-9102 |
| Date | January 2008 |
| Creators | Bergfors, Monica |
| Publisher | Uppsala University, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala : Universitetsbiblioteket |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, text |
Page generated in 0.1956 seconds