Return to search

Three Paradigms of Emotional Learning Differentially Affect Brainstem, Hypothalamic, and Limbic Circuits in the Rat

Three Paradigms of Emotional Learning Differentially Affect Brainstem, Hypothalamic, and Limbic Circuits in the Rat
Elizabeth A. Myers, M.S.
University of Pittsburgh, 2004
Noradrenergic (NA) signaling in limbic forebrain regions, such as the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), shapes the encoding and expression of emotional learning, and modulates responses to stress and anxiety. The present study examined whether categorically different emotional stress models, [cholecystokinin (CCK), trimethylthiazoline (TMT), and yohimbine (YO)] support behaviorally aversive conditioning and differentially activate CRH-positive neurons in the hypothalamus, medullary and pontine NA neurons, and ascending inputs to the CeA. A conditioned flavor avoidance (CFA) paradigm using a flavor preference test was implemented as a measure of aversive conditioning for each stressor. In a terminal experiment, rats received either an injection of CCK (10 µg/kg, i.p.), YO (5 mg/kg. i.p.), or 15 min exposure to an aversive odor, TMT, and were perfused 60-120 min later. In a subset of rats, retrograde neural tracer was microinjected into the CeA prior to stressor treatment and perfusion. Brainstem and forebrain sections were processed for immunocytochemical localization of cFos and either dopamine beta hydroxylase (DbH) to identify NA neurons, corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), or neural tracer to identify hindbrain CeA-projecting neurons. All stressors activated hypothalamic CRH neurons, produced a relatively strong CFA in a 2-bottle choice test, and recruited similar proportions of CeA-projecting neurons arising from the parabrachial nucleus, a projection path critical for this behavioral paradigm. All stressors recruited NA neurons within the medullary A2 cell group to a similar extent, whereas those in the medullary A1 cell group and pontine A6 cell group were recruited more selectively by TMT and YO compared to CCK. Afferent inputs to the CeA arising in these hindbrain cell groups were activated in a parallel manner, with TMT and YO recruiting a much greater proportion of CeA-projecting neurons in the A1 and A6 cell groups. These findings lend support to the working hypothesis that different emotional stimuli may potentially influence emotional learning via stressor-specific ascending NA projection pathways to the CeA. In general, elucidating stressor-specific neural circuitry may provide new insight into how to design effective therapeutic measures for a wide range of human disorders and conditions involving the NA system.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-07082004-143246
Date05 October 2004
CreatorsMyers, Elizabeth Anne
ContributorsJohn P. Card, Ph.D., Anthony Grace, Ph.D., Linda Rinaman, Ph.D.
PublisherUniversity of Pittsburgh
Source SetsUniversity of Pittsburgh
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-07082004-143246/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0019 seconds