A computerized program was designed to test whether arranging a common element in two, otherwise independent, 2-term correlations (stimulus-stimulus and response-stimulus) would result in emergent simple discriminative-stimulus properties for the antecedent stimulus relative to an arrangement with no common elements programmed. Data from 8 adult participants in this experiment indicate that common element arrangements led to relatively high rates of responding in the presence of the putative discriminative stimulus and relatively low rates or no responding in the presence of the putative s-delta during testing in extinction. Conversely, the uncommon element arrangements produced no clear discriminative control. The current data reflect a comparison of arrangements across subjects. These data support Sidman's (2000) suggestion that common elements among contingencies are sufficient to produce stimulus classes and cause class mergers. The data also have implications for thinking about the mechanism by which and the conditions under which discriminative control develops. Finally, these data have the potential to inform the programming and implementation of reinforcement contingencies in applied settings.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc1505220 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Niland, Haven Sierra |
| Contributors | Vaidya, Manish, Toussaint, Karen, Bergmann, Samantha |
| Publisher | University of North Texas |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | v, 32 pages, Text |
| Rights | Public, Niland, Haven Sierra, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds